Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Zhaohui Jin , Jesse G. Dixon , Hiral D. Parekh , Steven R Alberts , Greg Yothers , Carmen Joseph Allegra , Rachel Kerr , Daniel G. Haller , Aimery De Gramont , Takayuki Yoshino , Eric Van Cutsem , Chris Twelves , Julien Taieb , Leonard B. Saltz , Jean-François Seitz , Thierry Andre , Amit Mahipal , Richard M. Goldberg , Qian Shi , Thomas J. George
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality has decreased since the 1970s but the incidence is increasing in young adults (age 20-49). The incidence of early onset CRC (eoCRC) will keep increasing significantly based on the trends of the SEER CRC registry data. There is limited data suggesting eoCRC may have different behaviors compared to traditional CRC (tCRC, age ≥ 50). Methods: Individual pt data of 47184 stage II/III CRC pts from 25 randomized studies in the ACCENT database were pooled. The distributions of demographics, clinicopathological features, biomarker status, and treatment-related data were summarized by age group. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free rate (RFR), and survival after recurrence (SAR) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models stratified by treatment arms within studies, adjusting for stage, performance status (PS), BMI and grade. Results: Using 5% difference between age groups as clinically meaningful cutoff, eoCRC had similar gender, race, ethnicity, PS, risk group, disease sidedness and T stage as tCRC. eoCRC were less likely overweight (30 vs 36%) and more pts had ≥ 12 lymph nodes resected (63 vs 51%). eoCRC had more frequent dMMR status (18 vs 12%), less BRAF mutations (5 vs 13%), and more dMMR/BRAF wild type (WT) status (17 vs 7%). Overall, eoCRC had better OS, DFS, and SAR, with the most significant differences between the < 30 and > = 70 age groups. Similar results were observed within pMMR pts. eoCRC experienced less hematological side effects, diarrhea, and stomatitis, but had more nausea and/or vomiting. Conclusions: eoCRC have unique characteristics; although statistically significant, the clinical differences in outcomes between eoCRC and tCRC are potentially due to the difference seen in extremely young and old pts. eoCRC have a different adverse events panel compared to tCRC.
eoCRC | tCRC | Adjusted Hazard Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Overall | ||||
n | 8242 | 38942 | ||
5-y OS,% | 78.9 | 74.4 | 0.75 | 0.69-0.82** |
5-y DFS, % | 68.9 | 65.2 | 0.87 | 0.81-0.93** |
5-y RFR, % | 70.2 | 68.8 | 0.94 | 0.88-1.01 |
median SAR, mos | 25.2 | 21.6 | 0.81 | 0.74-0.89** |
pMMR | ||||
n | 2121 | 9710 | ||
5-y OS,% | 81.3 | 78.8 | 0.76 | 0.66-0.88** |
5-y DFS, % | 70.8 | 67.9 | 0.86 | 0.76-0.97* |
5-y RFR, % | 72.2 | 70.8 | 0.95 | 0.83-1.07 |
median SAR, mos | 30.0 | 25.2 | 0.87 | 0.75-1.02 |
dMMR | ||||
n | 471 | 1364 | ||
5-y OS,% | 86.7 | 80.7 | 0.62 | 0.41-0.93* |
5-y DFS, % | 80.0 | 75.9 | 0.74 | 0.53-1.04 |
5-y RFR, % | 81.2 | 80.6 | 0.86 | 0.60-1.23 |
median SAR, mos | 27.6 | 15.6 | 0.78 | 0.48-1.28 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Michael Untch
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Issa Mohamad
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Rona Yaeger
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Roy S. Herbst