POLO: Quality-adjusted (QA) progression-free survival (PFS) and patient (pt)-centered outcomes with maintenance olaparib in pts with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPaC).

Authors

null

Hyun Kyoo Yoo

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Hyun Kyoo Yoo , Hedy L. Kindler , Susan McCutcheon , David McGuinness , Nikunj Patel , Robert Hettle , Rory Goodbody , Seongjung Joo , Gershon Y. Locker , Talia Golan

Organizations

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, The Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center at Tel-Hashomer, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, US

Background: In the Phase III POLO trial (NCT02184195), maintenance olaparib significantly prolonged PFS vs placebo in pts with a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) and mPaC (median 7.4 vs. 3.8 months). The aim of maintenance treatment is to extend PFS and survival without compromising health-related quality of life due to adverse events. The duration of time spent without symptoms or toxicities (TWiST) and the QA-PFS were assessed in a post hoc analysis of the POLO trial. Methods: Patients were randomized 3:2 to receive maintenance olaparib (tablets; 300 mg bid) or placebo. Restricted mean (RM)-PFS was calculated by estimating the area under the Kaplan–Meier PFS curve between randomization and 29.8 months after randomization (maximum follow-up for the placebo arm in POLO). Patient-centered outcomes were assessed by QA-PFS (derived from the product of the EQ-5D-5L single-index utility score from randomization to disease progression and RM-PFS) and TWiST (RM-PFS minus time with toxicity after randomization). Results: RM-PFS was significantly longer with olaparib, with a between-treatment difference of 4.8 months (P=0.009; Table). Over this period, no significant or meaningful differences in mean EQ-5D-5L index were observed between treatment groups. The corresponding mean QA-PFS was significantly longer with olaparib vs placebo. TWiST analysis demonstrated a benefit with olaparib over placebo (Table): between-arm difference, 3.8 months (P=0.039) for the primary analysis (criteria 1: grade ≥2 nausea, vomiting or fatigue). Sensitivity analysis (criteria 1 plus abdominal pain, diarrhea, decreased appetite or constipation) also revealed a trend toward benefit with olaparib (difference: 3.4 months, P=0.062). Conclusions: Consistent with the primary PFS analysis of the POLO trial, RM-PFS and QA-PFS were significantly longer with maintenance olaparib than with placebo. As demonstrated by the findings of the TWiST analyses, the PFS benefit observed with olaparib in pts with a gBRCAm and mPaC persists even when symptoms of toxicity are considered. Clinical trial information: NCT02184195.

Endpoints (months)Placebo
N=62
Olaparib
N=92
Difference (P)
RM-PFS7.0111.784.77 (0.009)
Mean EQ-5D-5L*0.810.78−0.03 (0.28)
Mean QA-PFS5.659.183.53 (0.016)
Mean TWiST (primary analysis)6.8910.693.81 (0.039)
Mean TWiST (sensitivity analysis)6.8010.183.39 (0.062)

*Higher scores indicate better health status.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02184195

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 4626)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.4626

Abstract #

4626

Poster Bd #

234

Abstract Disclosures