Randomized phase II trial of MIBG versus MIBG/vincristine/irinotecan versus MIBG/vorinostat for relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: A report from the New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Consortium.

Authors

null

Steven G. DuBois

Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA

Steven G. DuBois , Meaghan Granger , Susan G. Groshen , Denice Tsao-Wei , Anasheh Shamirian , Scarlett Czarnecki , Fariba Goodarzian , Rachel Berkovich , Hiroyuki Shimada , Yael P. Mosse , Suzanne Shusterman , Susan Lerner Cohn , Kelly C. Goldsmith , Brian D. Weiss , Gregory A. Yanik , Clare Twist , Meredith Irwin , Julie R. Park , Araz Marachelian , Katherine K. Matthay

Organizations

Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Riverside, CA, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health, Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) remains one of the most active agents for neuroblastoma. It is not clear if putative radiation sensitizers improve upon this activity. The primary aim of this trial was to identify the MIBG treatment regimen with highest response rate among: MIBG monotherapy (Arm A); MIBG/Vincristine/Irinotecan (Arm B); MIBG/Vorinostat (Arm C). The secondary aim was to compare toxicity across arms. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized phase II trial. Patients 1-30 years with relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma were eligible with at least one MIBG-avid site and adequate autologous stem cells (ASCs). All patients received MIBG 18 mCi/kg on Day 1 and ASC on day 15. Patients on Arm A received only MIBG; patients on Arm B also received vincristine (2 mg/m2) IV on Day 0 and irinotecan (50 mg/m2) IV daily on Days 0-4; patients on Arm C also received vorinostat (180 mg/m2) orally once daily on days -1 to 12. The primary endpoint was response after one course according to NANT response criteria. The trial was designed as a pick-the-winner study with a maximum of 105 eligible and evaluable patients to ensure an 80% chance that the arm with highest response rate is selected, if that response rate is at least 15% higher than the other arms. Results: 114 patients enrolled. Three patients were ineligible and 6 eligible patients never received MIBG, leaving 105 eligible and evaluable patients (36 Arm A; 35 Arm B; and 34 Arm C; 55 boys; median age 6.5 years). 9 patients had received prior MIBG monotherapy, 65 prior irinotecan, and 7 prior vorinostat. After one course, the response rates (Partial Response or better) on Arms A, B, and C were 17% (95% CI 7-33%), 14% (5-31%), and 32% (18-51%). An additional 4, 4, and 7 patients met NANT Minor Response criteria [partial response in one disease category (e.g., bone marrow) and stable disease in other categories] on Arms A, B, and C, respectively. On Arms A, B, and C, rates of any grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity were 19%, 49% and 32%; rates of grade 3+ diarrhea were 0%, 11%, 0%; and rates of grade 3+ febrile neutropenia were 6%, 11%, and 0%. Conclusions: The combination of vorinostat/MIBG had the highest response rate, with manageable toxicity. Vincristine and irinotecan do not improve the response rate to MIBG and are associated with increased toxicity. These data provide response rates for MIBG monotherapy in a contemporary patient population assessed with current response criteria. Clinical trial information: NCT02035137

U.S. National Institutes of Health Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Pediatric Oncology I

Track

Pediatric Oncology

Sub Track

Pediatric Solid Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02035137

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 10500)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.10500

Abstract #

10500

Abstract Disclosures