Different organ-specific response to nivolumab to determine the survival outcome of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).

Authors

Han Sang Kim

Han Sang Kim

Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea

Han Sang Kim , Jung Yong Hong , Jaekyung Cheon , Ilhwan Kim , Chang Gon Kim , Beodeul Kang , Dae Jung Kim , Chan Kim , Hongjae Chon , Hye Jin Choi , Ho Yeong Lim

Organizations

Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea, Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea, Medical Oncology, Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea, Department of Radiology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, South Korea, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, South Korea, CHA Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Previously, two phase III clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) failed to meet their primary endpoints, leading to doubts regarding the clinical activity of ICI monotherapy in patients with aHCC. Here, we comprehensively examined clinicopathological factors and estimated their association with survival outcomes in aHCC patients treated with nivolumab. Methods: A total of 261 eligible patients from 5 high-volume centers who were treated with nivolumab between June 9, 2012 and March 14, 2018 and had measurable diseases were reviewed. We reviewed more than 80 clinicopathological factors and categorized them into 6 areas: 1) demographics (n = 16); 2) baseline laboratory values (n = 19); 3) tumor burden (n = 12); 4) previous treatment (n = 12); 5) treatment response (n = 5); 6) toxicity profiles (n = 18). Their association with survival outcomes were evaluated, and organ-specific response evaluation, adapted from RECIST 1.1, was conducted. Results: Of the 261 patients, 218 (84%) had extrahepatic spread. The median follow-up time was 4.5 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.8) and 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.0-8.2). Objective response rate was 15%. Subgroup analyses revealed that compensated liver function (Child-Pugh score A5/6), surrogate markers for low tumor burden (low AFP, low PIVKA, and low LDH level), inflammatory markers (low C-reactive protein [CRP], low erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], high lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio [LMR]), and low intrahepatic tumor burden were significantly associated with longer OS. A total of 456 individual lesions (liver, n = 249; lung, n = 124; lymph node, n = 35; others such as boner soft tissues, n = 48) were examined. Organ-specific response rates (hepatic tumor, 9%; lung, 25%; lymph node, 37%; others metastasis, 15%) were different, of which intrahepatic tumor was the least responsive organ to ICI treatment in aHCC. Conclusions: Underlying liver function, the tumor extent and burden, and the degree of plasma lymphocytes are crucial for determining tumor response to ICI in aHCC. Antitumor immune response to ICI differs in an organ-specific manner. The hepatic tumors of HCC may be less responsive to nivolumab than extrahepatic lesions.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 4584)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.4584

Abstract #

4584

Poster Bd #

192

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts