Will adding alkylating agent to bortezomib improve survival of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients?

Authors

Yumeng Zhang

Yumeng Zhang

University of South Florida, Tampa, FL

Yumeng Zhang , Lauren Duncanson , Taiga Nishihori , Doris K. Hansen , Jose L. Ochoa-Bayona , Hien D Liu , Rachid C. Baz , Brandon Jamaal Blue

Organizations

University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Moffitt Cancer Ctr, Tampa, FL, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Barnes-Jewish Hosp, St. Louis, MO

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: The combination of bortezomib (Bort) and alkylating agent (AA) is a frequently used first-line therapy for AL amyloidosis. Kastritis et al. compared melphalan and dexamethasone with or without bortezomib as primary therapy and demonstrated increased hematologic response rate with the bortezomib and melphalan combination. However, the role of AA is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate if adding AA to Bort improved patient outcomes in AL amyloidosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data on 209 patients with systemic AL Amyloidosis at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2008 and 2020. We excluded patients with localized amyloidosis or amyloid other than AL. Patients were divided into two groups based on upfront therapy: A) Bort and B) Bort + AA. All patients also received dexamethasone. The staging was per Mayo 2012. Organ involvement, response, and progression were defined based on the 2005 criteria. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from initial diagnosis until death or last contact. Time to next therapy (TTNT) was calculated in patients with the documented hematologic response from the time of initiation of therapy to time of the next therapy/last follow up/death. Results: Of 209 patients, 36% (n=76) received Bort+AA; 30% (n=62) received Bort. No significant difference in clinical characteristics was seen in both groups except for age (which was higher for arm A: median 65 and 62 years, respectively, p=0.043) (table). In addition, Bort+AA became more commonly used as a frontline therapy after 1/1/2014 (p=0.001). Group A and B had similar median OS (69.9 months [95% CI. 44.7-95.2] and 64.4 mo [95% CI 40.5-88.3] respectively, p=0.60). 86% of patients in group B achieved a hematologic response as compared to 74% of patients in group A (p=0.15). Similarly, 47% of patients in group B achieved an organ response as compared to 34% of patients in group A (p=0.22). TTNT was higher in group A than group B (16.9 mo [95% CI, 0-41.5] and 7.8 mo [95% CI, 3.5-12.0], respectively, p=0.08). Conclusions: While Bort+AA is a commonly used regimen for amyloidosis, the addition of AA to Bort did not result in superior OS, TTNT compared to Bort alone in this retrospective study. This finding should be confirmed in prospective studies. Baseline Characteristics.

Baseline characteristics.

CharacteristicGroup A
n=62
Group B
n=76
P value
Male, %60630.73
Age at diagnosis, median65620.04
Date of diagnosis before 1/2014, %50220.001
Stage I, %30180.50
Stage II, %2227
Stage III, %2832
Stage IV, %2023
Hematologic response36/49 (73%)55/64 (85%)0.15
Organ Response15/44 (34%)24/51 (47%)0.22

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Other

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 8517)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8517

Abstract #

8517

Poster Bd #

417

Abstract Disclosures