Impact of baseline symptom burden as assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors

Atul Batra

Atul Batra

Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada

Atul Batra , Colleen Ann Cuthbert , Andrew Harper , Lin Yang , Devon J. Boyne , Rodrigo Rigo , Winson Y. Cheung

Organizations

Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB, Canada, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Patients with metastatic cancer experience variable symptom burden, but serial symptom assessments using PROs may be challenging to implement in routine clinical practices. We aimed to determine if a single measurement of symptom burden at the time of metastatic diagnosis is associated with survival. Methods: We examined prospectively collected baseline PROs of patients newly diagnosed with metastatic breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer using the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESASr) questionnaire from a large province (Alberta, Canada) between 2016 and 2019. The ESASr was categorized into physical (PH), psychosocial (PS), and total symptom (TS) domains whereby scores were classified as mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to evaluate the effect of baseline symptom scores on OS. Results: We identified 1,315 patients, of whom 57% were men and median age was 66 (IQR, 27-93) years. There were 180, 601, 240, and 294 patients with breast, lung, colorectal, and prostate cancer, respectively. Approximately one-quarter of all patients reported moderate to severe PH, PS, and TS scores, with lung cancer patients experiencing the highest symptom intensity across all domains (P<0.0001). While age did not affect symptom scores, women were more likely to report severe PH, PS, and TS scores as compared to men (P=0.02, 0.002, and 0.007, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, older age (HR 1.02, 95% CI, 1.02-1.03, P<0.0001) and female sex (HR 1.67, 95% CI, 1.39-1.99, P<0.0001) were predictive of worse OS as were severe baseline PH and TS scores (see Table) . However, baseline PS scores were not related to OS. Conclusions: A single assessment of baseline symptom burden using the ESASr in patients with metastatic cancer has significant prognostic value. This may represent a feasible first step toward routine collection of PROs in real-world settings where serial symptom measurements can be challenging to implement.

OS by symptom burden.

Group (n)Median OS, in months (95% CI)HR (95% CI)P value
PH
Mild (885)33.5 (30.2-36.4)--
Moderate (368)12.2 (10.1-15.1)1.68 (1.32-2.13)<0.0001
Severe (62)10.8 (4.9-17.7)1.89 (1.26-2.83)0.002
PS
Mild (946)29.1 (25.5-33.3)--
Moderate (243)16.1 (12.4-20.8)1.15 (0.94-1.41)0.17
Severe (117)10.7 (8.1-16.9)1.13 (0.85-1.52)0.39
TS
Mild (924)32.5 (28.6-35.1)--
Moderate (350)12.2 (10.1-15.1)1.27 (0.96-1.68)0.09
Severe (41)7.9 (3.5-16.9)1.71 (1.01-2.91)0.04

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Symptoms and Survivorship

Track

Symptom Science and Palliative Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 12020)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.12020

Abstract #

12020

Poster Bd #

308

Abstract Disclosures