Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Sheheryar Kairas Kabraji , Liam F. Spurr , Melissa E Hughes , Yvonne Y. Li , Jose Pablo Leone , Ana Christina Garrido-Castro , Romualdo Barroso-Sousa , Janet Files , Gregory Kirkner , Bruce E. Johnson , Eric P. Winer , Andrew D. Cherniack , Nancy U. Lin
Background: Genomic characterization of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) has thus far been limited. The objective of this study was to describe the landscape of genomic alterations in patients (pts) with BCBMs. Methods: Targeted next-generation DNA sequencing of > 300 cancer-related genes (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on primary and metastatic (met) tumors in 321 pts with a diagnosis of BCBM between August 2016 and April 2019 at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (table). Enrichment analysis of genomic alterations was performed using a two-sided Fisher exact test and differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB) between groups were assessed using two-sided Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple comparison correction was performed using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Results: All subtypes were represented in BCBM (25 HR+/HER2-; 24 HR+/HER2+; 27 HR-/HER2+; 18 TNBC; 5 unknown; n = 99) and extracranial (EC) samples: (96 HR+/HER2-; 32 HR+/HER2+; 22 HR-/HER2+; 41 TNBC; 31 unknown; n = 222). BCBMs were found most commonly to have mutations or copy number alterations in TP53, ERBB2, PIK3CA, GATA3, PTEN, ESR1, CDH1, BRCA2, ARID1A, BRCA1 (>5% frequency, table). Two pts acquired ERBB2 amplification (amp) between the matched primary breast sample and brain met. In pair-wise comparisons of BCBMs to unmatched primaries or EC mets, only ERBB2 amp was significantly enriched (table, † = adjusted p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in TMB between BCBM and EC mets (median 9.12 vs 7.26, p = 0.15). In contrast, TMB was significantly higher in BCBMs compared to unmatched primaries (median 9.12 vs 7.26, p=0.005). Conclusions: BCBMs display similar mutations and copy number alterations compared to primary tumors and EC mets in pts with BCBM. These data suggest that BCBMs contain actionable genomic alterations that are most often also reflected in EC disease. Alterations in ERBB2, PIK3CA/PTEN, and BRCA1/2 represent potentially targetable alterations in pts with BCBM.
Genomic alteration | Matched | Unmatched | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCBM (n=16) | Primary (n=13), Met (n=3) | BCBM (n=99) | Primary (n=125) | EC met (n=85) | |
ERBB2 amp | 62.5 (10) | 50 (8) | 53.5 (56) † | 24.8 (31) | 17.6 (15) |
TP53 mut | 12.5 (2) | 31.25 (5) | 48.4 (48) | 45.6 (57) | 42.4 (36) |
PIK3CA mut | 12.5 (2) | 18.75 (3) | 24.2 (24) | 22.4 (28) | 25.8 (22) |
ARID1A mut | 0 (0) | 6.25 (1) | 7 (7) | 4 (5) | 5.8 (5) |
ESR1 mut | 6.25 (1) | 6.25 (1) | 6 (6) | 1.6 (2) | 12.9 (11) |
BRCA2 mut | 12.5 (2) | 6.25 (1) | 5 (5) | 5.6 (7) | 4.7 (4) |
GATA3 mut | 0 (0) | 18.75 (3) | 5 (5) | 6.4 (8) | 10.5 (9) |
CDH1 mut | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 5 (5) | 10 (8) | 5.8 (5) |
PTEN mut | 6.25 (1) | 6.25 (1) | 3 (3) | 4.8 (6) | 10.5 (9) |
BRCA1 mut | 0 (0) | 6.25 (1) | 3 (3) | 0.8 (1) | 4.7 (4) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Melissa Taylor
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jason A Mouabbi
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Daria Seriak
2019 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Sibylle Loibl