Establishing the six-month resource utilization and cost-of-care for the treatment of first-line metastatic BRAF (V600) melanoma with combination BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Authors

null

Shiraz Halloush

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

Shiraz Halloush , Stephen Huber , Hanna Kim , Jim M. Koeller

Organizations

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, CommGeniX, Kingwood, TX, Univ of Texas Health Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Array BioParma

Background: Comparative data on cancer therapy health care resource utilization (HCRU) and associated cost will be helpful as value-based healthcare moves forward. BRAF & MEK inhibitor combinations are considered first-line treatment for BRAF (V-600) metastatic melanoma (MM), although head-to-head trials are lacking. We aimed to establish the real-world HCRU and 6-month (mo) cost-of-care in V-600 MM treated with BRAF & MEK inhibitor therapy. Methods: A single data team in 2018 performed a multicenter, retrospective chart audit of adult patients with BRAF V-600 MM. Four institutions from across the US with patients who had received either dabrafenib + Trametinib (DT) or vemurafenib + cobimetinib (VC) were enrolled. In the most recent 12 mo period, data was captured from the start of therapy for 6 mo or until therapy was stopped. Dose change or stoppage was accessed for cause (toxicity, disease, death, other). Variables included hospitalization, emergency room (ER), all clinic visits (routine + extra), scans, labs, and treatment drug (AWP). Medicare reimbursed rates were applied for cost estimates. Utilization and costs were measured on per patient per month (PPPM) bases and the total cost over 6 mo for each combination. Results: Of the 42 patients included, 34 and 8 were initiated on DT and VC, respectively. Proportions of patients with extra clinic visits and hospital admissions were 79%, 15% and 75%, 13%, respectively for DT and VC. PPPM hospitalization was the lowest among the resources utilized 0.24 for DT and 0.17 for VC. A higher proportion of VC patients (75%) had a dose reduction due to drug toxicity compared with 29% of patients treated with DT (P < 0.05). Discontinuation rates were the same between both combinations (0.26). 32 patients had completed 6 mo of treatment (26 DT and 6 VC). For those DT, the mean total costs including drug and the mean monthly total costs were $157,253 and $26,209 compared to $107,240 and $17,873 for VC, respectively. The mean total costs for hospitalization were $10,562 for DT and $7,456 for VC. The mean total costs for the drug were $145,012 for DT and $97,924 for VC. Conclusions: The 6-month total cost-of-care for the treatment of first-line V-600 MM with DT was $157,253 and $107,240 for VC, mostly attributable to drug cost. In a value-based healthcare system, total 6-month cost-of-care may help distinguish between equally effective regimens.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr e19396)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e19396

Abstract #

e19396

Abstract Disclosures