Pooled safety analysis of single-agent lurbinectedin versus topotecan (Results from a randomized phase III trial CORAIL and a phase II basket trial).

Authors

null

Alexandra Leary

Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Alexandra Leary , Stephanie Gaillard , Ignace Vergote , Jose Trigo , Carmen Maria Kahatt , Antonio Nieto , Cristian Marcelo Fernandez , Martin Cullell-Young , Ali Hassan Zeaiter , Vivek Subbiah

Organizations

Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, BGOG and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium, Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain, PharmaMar, Madrid, Spain, PharmaMar, Colmenar Viejo-Madrid, Spain, PharmaMar, Barcelona, Spain, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
PharmaMar SA

Background: Lurbinectedin (L), an inhibitor of active transcription, has shown activity in second-line (2L) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (ASCO 2019). Topotecan (T) is the only approved drug in 2L SCLC and is also used in platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). Methods: This pooled safety analysis includes data from 554 patients (pts) treated with L at 3.2 mg/m2 Day 1 q3wk 1-h (no primary prophylaxis with G-CSF required): 335 with selected solid tumors (9 indications, including 105 pts with SCLC) from a phase II Basket study and 219 with PROC in the phase III CORAIL study. An indirect exploratory comparison (pooled data from CORAIL + Basket) and a direct comparison (data from CORAIL) of L vs. T are presented. Results: Most common adverse events with L were grade 1/2 fatigue, nausea and vomiting. Treatment-related (L/T): dose reductions: 22.9/48.3%, delays: 25.8/52.9%, grade ≥3 serious adverse events (SAEs): 15.0/32.2%, discontinuations: 3.2/5.7%, deaths: 1.3/1.5%, G-CSF use: 23.8/70.1%, and transfusions: 15.9/52.9%. Conclusions: Lurbinectedin has a predictable and manageable safety profile. A significant safety advantage was observed when lurbinectedin was compared with topotecan in the CORAIL trial in terms of hematological toxicities. With the limitations of indirect comparisons, in the pooled safety analysis, fewer lurbinectedin-treated pts had severe hematological toxicities, SAEs, dose adjustments, treatment discontinuations and use of supportive treatments than topotecan-treated pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02421588 and NCT02454972.

Safety profile (L vs. T): grade 3/4 adverse events (related or unknown) and laboratory abnormalities (regardless of relationship).

Lurbinectedin
3.2 mg/m2 1-h iv q3wk
Topotecan
1.5 mg/m2 D1-D5 iv q3wk
P-value
CORAIL
(L vs. T)
L Pool
(n=554)
L CORAIL
(n=219)
T CORAIL
(n=87)
Neutropenia40.632.078.2 a<.0001
Leukopenia29.623.757.5 a<.0001
Anemia17.117.856.3<.0001
Thrombocytopenia9.99.133.3<.0001
ALT increase6.96.83.60.42
Fatigue6.77.313.80.08
FN6.35.511.5 a0.08
Nausea3.25.94.60.79
Vomiting2.95.53.40.57
Diarrhea0.90.94.60.06

a Primary G-CSF prophylaxis allowed.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Molecularly Targeted Agents and Tumor Biology

Track

Developmental Therapeutics—Molecularly Targeted Agents and Tumor Biology

Sub Track

Other Developmental Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02421588 and NCT02454972

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 3635)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3635

Abstract #

3635

Poster Bd #

365

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Safety analysis of lurbinectedin versus topotecan in elderly patients.

First Author: Vivek Subbiah

First Author: Alejandro Navarro