Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
Tim H. Brümmendorf , Jorge E. Cortes , Yeow Tee Goh , Musa Yilmaz , Rebecca B. Klisovic , Simon Purcell , Andrea Viqueira , Eric Leip , Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini
Background: BOS is approved for newly diagnosed CP CML and CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy. In a phase I/II study, BOS showed durable efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients (pts) with CP CML after IMA failure. We report an ≥8-y update of this phase I/II and ongoing extension study. Methods: Pts with CP CML resistant/intolerant to IMA (CP2L) or IMA + dasatinib and/or nilotinib (CP3L) or with accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP) CML or Philadelphia chromosome+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (ADV) received BOS starting at 500 mg/d. Results: 54/284 (19%) CP2L pts were still on BOS after ≥9 y and 8/119 (7%) CP3L and 5/167 (3%) ADV pts after ≥8 y; 61 CP2L pts discontinued BOS since y 5 and 21 CP3L and 12 ADV pts since y 4. Overall, the most common reason for discontinuation was disease progression/lack of efficacy in CP2L (27%), CP3L (42%) and ADV (50%) pts; last dose before discontinuation was ≥500 mg/d in 59 (21%), 28 (24%) and 46 (28%) pts, respectively. In CP2L pts, median (range) of follow-up was 54 (1–155) mo, treatment duration 26 (<1–155) mo and dose intensity 438 (87–599) mg/d; responses were durable (Table) and overall survival (OS) at 9 y was 74% vs 84% at 5 y. OS at 8 y was 69% in CP3L, 54% in AP CML and 23% in BP CML pts vs 78%, 59% and 23% at 4 y. 55 CP2L, 29 CP3L and 98 ADV pts died on study (10, 3 and 2 since the 4/5-y reports); 15, 5 and 3 had on-treatment transformations to AP/BP. Most common new treatment-emergent adverse events since y 5 in CP2L pts were pleural effusion (n=13), arthralgia (n=12) and increased blood creatinine (n=11). Conclusions: After ≥8 y, BOS continued to show durable efficacy and no new safety signals in pts with CP CML on long-term treatment, providing further support for BOS use after prior TKIs. Clinical trial information: NCT00261846 and NCT01903733.
IMA-resistant n=195 | IMA-intolerant n=89 | Total CP2L n=284 | |
---|---|---|---|
Cytogenetic response, n* | 182 | 80 | 262 |
MCyR†, n (%) | 109 (60) | 49 (61) | 158 (60) |
9-y probability of maintaining MCyR‡, % (95% CI) | 63 (52–72) | 75 (57–87) | 67 (58–74) |
CCyR†, n (%) | 88 (48) | 42 (53) | 130 (50) |
9-y probability of maintaining CCyR‡, % (95% CI) | 64 (52–74) | 64 (44–78) | 64 (54–72) |
MMR, n*,§ | 127 | 70 | 197 |
MMR, n (%) | 58 (46) | 25 (36) | 83 (42) |
9-y probability of maintaining MMR‡, % (95% CI) | 56 (41–68) | 81 (57–93) | 63 (50–73) |
* Evaluable pts had a valid baseline assessment
† Maintained/newly attained; CCyR imputed from MMR in extension study
‡ Kaplan-Meier estimate for responders only
§ Molecular data not available for pts in China, Russia, South Africa and India
CCyR=complete cytogenetic response; MCyR=major cytogenetic response; MMR=major molecular response
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Angela Awino MCLIGEYO
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Ehab L. Atallah
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Yann-Alexandre Vano