A fork in the road: A mixed methods study exploring why older adults with acute myeloid leukemia choose different treatment paths.

Authors

Thomas LeBlanc

Thomas William LeBlanc

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Thomas William LeBlanc , Roland B. Walter , Loriana Hernandez , Lucy Morgan , Timothy Bell , Charlotte Panter , Francois Peloquin , Jasmine Healy , Adam Gater , Verna Welch , Karim Amer , Louise O'Hara , Ryan Hohman , Andrew Brown , Nigel Russell , Diana M. Merino , Neil Horikoshi , Dawn Maze

Organizations

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, ArmorUp for Live, Philadelphia, PA, Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom, Pfizer Oncology, New York, NY, Pfizer Canada Inc, Kirkland, QC, Canada, Adelphi Values, Cheshire, United Kingdom, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, United Kingdom, Friends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC, Department of Haematology, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation, Bethesda, MD, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Pfizer

Background: Current treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are diverse, including intensive chemotherapy (IC), low intensity therapy, best supportive care (BSC), and hospice care. Despite continued development of new therapies, recent data suggest that approximately 60% of older US patients remain untreated, but reasons for this are not well understood. By gathering insights from physicians, patients, and their family members, this study aims to better understand the factors that influence treatment decisions for adults with AML. Methods: Physicians in the US (n=4), UK (n=3) and Canada (n=3), and 15 US AML patient-family member dyads took part in one-on-one, 60-minute semi-structured interviews. Each participant rated a series of factors on a scale from 0 (not at all important) to 3 (very important) to determine their importance in treatment decision-making. Among the 15 adults with AML (>65 years, not taking IC) interviewed thus far, 13 had not received any treatment. Additional interviews are scheduled in the UK and Canada with patients having varied treatment experiences (data will be available for presentation). Results: To date, findings highlight the key role perceptions of side effects and patient health play in treatment decision making. A fear of treatment side effects was the primary reason patients (n=9/13) opted not to receive treatment. For the 2/15 study patients who had received treatment, side effects were considered the worst part of their treatment experience. Physicians also stated patients on BSC would be more willing to take low intensity treatments if risks (e.g., side effects) were minimized. Patients (n=11/15), their family members (n=11/15), and physicians (n=10/10) agreed that patients’ health (including age and comorbidities) influenced if treatment was pursued. Additionally, US physicians suggested that some patients have little desire to pursue treatment, with patients’ perception of low intensity therapy having poor efficacy and proximity of care influencing their choice for BSC or hospice care. Further analysis will explore other factors influencing patients’ treatment decisions and differences among patients who receive treatment versus those who do not. Conclusions: The treatment decision-making process for older adults with AML is complex and multifactorial. Understanding factors that influence treatment decisions is important if drug developers and prescribers are to ensure the availability of therapies that better align with individual patients’ needs.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Acute Leukemia

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 7520)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.7520

Abstract #

7520

Poster Bd #

293

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts