Genomic alterations in visceral versus nonvisceral “metastatic” site tumor tissue in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC).

Authors

null

John Esther

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

John Esther , Umang Swami , Jonathan Chipman , Taylor Ryan McFarland , Andrew W Hahn , Deepika Sirohi , Prayushi Sharma , Roberto Nussenzveig , Neeraj Agarwal , Benjamin Louis Maughan

Organizations

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, Huntsman Cancer Institute-University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, University of Utah Hunstman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, University of Utah and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Men with mPC with visceral metastasis, as compared to non-visceral disease have inferior outcomes regardless of therapy (PMID: 25403629). Herein, we hypothesize that visceral versus non-visceral metastasis sites differ with regards to underlying genomic alterations (GA). These GA possibly drive metastasis to visceral sites and mediate a more aggressive disease. Identifying these GA may guide future trial designs by better stratifying patients and predicting therapy responses. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of mPC and comprehensive genomic profiling of metastatic tissue by CLIA certified lab. Liver and lung were defined as visceral while bone and lymph nodes were defined as non-visceral metastasis. Evaluated GA were p53, RB1, PTEN, AR, TMB, CDK12, SPOP, MYC, MET, BRCA genes, BRAF, ARID1A. Fisher’s Exact Test was used to compare GA in visceral and non-visceral tumor tissue. Results: Overall 54 men with mPC with visceral (n=8) and non-visceral (n=46) metastatic tissue biopsies were evaluated. Visceral biopsies included liver (3) and lung (5). Non-visceral biopsy sites included lymph nodes (33) and bone (13). Men with or without visceral metastasis had similar baseline characteristics (Fisher’s Exact Test and Wilcoxon Rank Test; Table). Visceral tumor tissue had a significantly greater odds of having RB1 mutation [OR = 12.09; 95% CI = (1.12, 178.21); p-value 0.02] as compared to non-visceral tumor tissue. Conclusions: RB1 GA were more common in visceral as compared to non-visceral metastatic sites in mPC. RB1 loss is associated with ineffectiveness to CDK4/6 inhibitors (PMID 26633733). These hypothesis-generating data suggest that men with mPC with visceral metastasis may not optimally benefit by enrollment on CDK4/6 inhibitor trials. BLM, NA: equal contribution.

Baseline characteristic or GANon-visceral (n=46)Visceral (n=8)p-value
Median age at diagnosis of metastatic disease (years)64680.46
Gleason ≥ 8 (%)41500.50
Median PSA (ng/ml)14.677.100.13
RB1 (%)4380.02
AR (%)2250.05
TP53 (%)41500.71
PTEN (%)22380.38

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Translational Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 167)

Abstract #

167

Poster Bd #

H3

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Smita Agrawal

First Author: Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani

First Author: Amado J. Zurita