Comprehensive targeted gene profiling to determine the genomic signature likely to drive progression of high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer to muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors

null

Abedalrhman Alkhateeb

University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada

Abedalrhman Alkhateeb , Govindaraja Atikukke , Lisa Porter , Bre-Anne Fifield , Dora Cavallo-Medved , Julianna Facca , Yasser El-Gohary , Tianmin Zhang , Osamah Hamzeh , Luis Rueda , Sindu Mary Kanjeekal

Organizations

University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada, ITOS Oncology, Windsor, ON, Canada, Windsor Regional Hospital, Windsor, ON, Canada, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada, Windsor Regional Cancer Centre, Windsor, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Other Foundation
windsor cancer centre foundation.

Background: Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer and eighth leading cause of cancer related-death in North America. It can present as non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and/or muscle invasive bladder (MIBC). Although genomic profiling studies have established that low-grade NMIBC and MIBC are genetically distinct, high-grade NMIBC can recur and progress to MIBC [ Knowles, M.A. and C.D. Hurst, 2015]. Low grade, non-invasive bladder cancers are characterized by activating mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), HRAS or other pathways of receptor kinase activation. High-grade disease, which is often becomes invasive, is characterized by inactivation of TP53 and Rb pathways [Kim, J., et al.]. Finding a subtype of invasive carcinoma with FGFR3 mutation may suggest an alternate pathway by which low grade, non-invasive pathology could transform into invasive disease [Knowles, M.A. and C.D. Hurst, 2015]. Methods: In this study, using a total of 30 bladder cancer (NMIBC and MIBC) patient samples from Windsor Regional Hospital Cancer Program, we performed comprehensive targeted gene sequencing to identify single nucleotide variants, small insertions / deletions, copy number variants and splice variants in over 500 common tumor genes panel. Results: Preliminary data from our study correlates with previously published mutation landscape for NMIBC and MIBC, and includes mutations in EGFR, FGFR3, FGFR4, PIK3CA, CDK6, ALK, JAK, as well as RET. While mutations in AKT1, BRCA1, CCND1, ERBB2, FGFR1, FGFR2, HRAS, and MET appear to be prevalent in NMIBC, mutations in IDH1 and MAP2K2 appear to be more common in MIBC. Three of the samples used in the study are from patients who progressed from high-grade NMIBC to MIBC. Conclusions: Therefore, have the genomic profiling performed at these two stages, which provides a unique ability to identify the potential “genomic triggers” for the transition.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, Testicular, and Adrenal Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 568)

Abstract #

568

Poster Bd #

M5

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Alissa Jamie Cooper

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Liquid-biopsy detection of FGFR2 and other actionable rearrangements in GI malignancies.

First Author: Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi

First Author: Michael Basin