A phase II trial of durvalumab (MEDI4736) and tremelimumab in metastatic, nontransitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.

Authors

Michal Sarfaty

Michal Sarfaty

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Michal Sarfaty , Irina Ostrovnaya , Min Yuen Teo , Gopa Iyer , Chung-Han Lee , Vanessa Peters , Jennifer Durocher , Ashley Marie Regazzi , Asia S. McCoy , Grace Hettich , Hikmat Al-Ahmadie , Joshua Chaim , Dean F. Bajorin , Jonathan E. Rosenberg , Samuel Aaron Funt

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AstraZeneca, Other Foundation.

Background: Non-transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract (non-TCC) includes several distinct histologies and is associated with a poor prognosis. Prospective data regarding management of patients with metastatic non-TCC is scarce. In this single-arm, phase II study, we assessed the activity and safety of durvalumab and tremelimumab in patients with metastatic non-TCC (NCT03430895). Methods: Eligible patients had unresectable/metastatic non-TCC with ECOG PS 0-1 regardless of prior therapy (except for patients with small cell carcinoma who must have progressed after chemotherapy). Patients received treatment with durvalumab 1500 mg and tremelimumab 75 mg IV Q4W for up to 4 cycles, then durvalumab 1500 mg IV Q4W for a total treatment duration of 12 months. The primary endpoint was overall response rate by RECIST 1.1. The study was planned as a Simon’s minimax two-stage design, with 13 patients planned for stage 1. If 1 or more responses were seen in stage 1, an additional 14 patients were planned to be accrued for a total of 27. Results: Thirteen patients were treated (median age 57 years; range, 33-76), including 7 (54%) with small cell carcinoma, 3 (23%) with squamous cell carcinoma, and 3 (23%) with adenocarcinoma. 11 patients (85%) had visceral metastases, and 6 patients (46%) had liver metastases. The study was terminated after stage 1 as no responses were seen; 11 patients (85%) had PD and 2 patients (15%) had SD as their best response. Median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI 1.25, not reached [NR]) with a median follow-up of 6.8 months (range 4.3 – 18.1 months). Median OS was 6.43 months (95% CI 4.36, NR). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 31% of patients. Conclusions: In this poor prognosis cohort of patients with non-TCC, no responses were seen with durvalumab and tremelimumab. Immune correlative studies to help determine mechanisms of resistance will be presented. Novel therapeutic strategies are urgently needed for patients with metastatic non-TCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03430895

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer; Urothelial Carcinoma; Penile, Urethral, Testicular, and Adrenal Cancers

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03430895

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 514)

Abstract #

514

Poster Bd #

J15

Abstract Disclosures