Pain response and health-related quality of life (HRQL) analysis in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving cabazitaxel (CBZ) versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in the CARD study.

Authors

Karim Fizazi

Karim Fizazi

Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France

Karim Fizazi , Gero Kramer , Jean-Christophe Eymard , Johann S. De Bono , Cora N. Sternberg , Daniel Castellano , Christian Wülfing , Michail Liontos , Joan Carles , Roberto Iacovelli , Bohuslav Melichar , Asgerour Sverrisdottir , Christine Theodore , Susan Feyerabend , Carole Helissey , Pascaline Picard , Ayse Ozatilgan , Christine Geffriaud-Ricouard , Ronald De Wit , Bertrand F. TOMBAL

Organizations

Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France, Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Institut Jean-Godinot, Reims, France, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Abteilung Urologie, Hamburg, Germany, Alexandra Hospital,National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, University of Verona, Verona, Italy, Fakultni Nemocnice Olomouc/Onkologicka Klinika, Pavlova, Czech Republic, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France, Studienpraxis Urologie, Nürtingen, Germany, Hôpital D'Instruction des Armées, Bégin, France, Ividata, Levallois Perret, France, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, Sanofi, Europe Medical Oncology, Paris, France, Erasmus University Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Institut d Recherche Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Sanofi.

Background: The CARD NCT02485691 study reported superior rPFS and OS with CBZ vs abiraterone or enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC who progressed on docetaxel and within 12 months on a previous alternative androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (ARTA). This analysis evaluated changes in pain and HRQL associated with CBZ and ARTA during the CARD study. Methods: Pain response was defined as a decrease > 30% from baseline in BPI-SF pain intensity score with no increased analgesic use. HRQL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire. Patients were evaluable if they had received at least one dose of CBZ or ARTA and had a baseline FACT-P score plus at least one subsequent FACT-P measurement. A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration of total FACT-P score was defined as a difference of ± 10 points from baseline. Clinically meaningful changes in HRQL and pain response were confirmed at two consecutive evaluations ≥ 3 weeks apart during the on-treatment period. Survival curves were generated by Kaplan–Meier estimates. Results: Of the 255 patients randomized, 172 (67.5%) had moderate to severe pain at randomization. Pain response and HRQL were evaluable for 111 (86.0%) and 108 (83.7%) for CBZ and 109 (86.5%) and 114 (90.5%) for ARTA. Pain response was 45.9% vs 19.3% for CBZ vs ARTA (p < 0.0001). The probability of not having pain progression after 12 months was 66.2% vs 45.3% CBZ vs ARTA (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32–0.97; p = 0.0348). An improvement in total FACT-P score from baseline was reported by 27 (25.0%) patients vs 26 (22.8%) for CBZ vs ARTA. FACT-P score was maintained or improved for 81 (75.0%) patients with CBZ and 86 (75.4%) patients with ARTA. A deterioration in FACT-P from baseline was reported by 22.2% with CBZ vs 24.6% with ARTA. Median time to FACT-P deterioration was 14.8 months for CBZ vs 8.9 months for ARTA (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.44–1.20; p = 0.2072). Conclusions: CBZ was associated with a greater pain response and delayed pain progression vs ARTA. CBZ and ARTA were associated with similar trends in HRQL but time to FACT-P deterioration was longer with CBZ vs ARTA. Clinical trial information: NCT02485691

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Rapid Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Rapid Abstract Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-World Evidence

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02485691

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 16)

Abstract #

16

Abstract Disclosures