Disulfiram (DSF) pharmacokinetics (PK) and copper PET imaging in a phase Ib study of intravenous (IV) copper loading with oral DSF for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Authors

Tian Zhang

Tian Zhang

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

Tian Zhang , Julie Kephart , Elizabeth Bronson , Monika Anand , Christine Daly , Ivan Spasojevic , Hannah Berg , Olga G. James , Patrick Healy , Susan Halabi , Michael Roger Harrison , Andrew J. Armstrong , Daniel J. George

Organizations

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, Duke University, Durham, NC, Department of Medicine-Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

Research Funding

Other Foundation
V Foundation for Cancer Research, Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company.

Background: In preclinical models of prostate cancer (PC), DSF reduced tumor growth when co-administered with copper (Cu). Further, intracellular Cu uptake is partially regulated by androgen-receptor signaling. Given these data, we conducted a phase Ib clinical trial of mCRPC patients (pts) receiving Cu with DSF. Methods: Pts with mCRPC were assigned to 1 of 3 cohorts: neuroendocrine PC (NEPC) (A), adenocarcinoma (adenoCA) mCRPC with non-liver/peritoneal metastases (B), and adenoCA mCRPC with liver and/or peritoneal metastases (C). IV CuCl2 was given weekly for 3 doses with oral daily DSF. After CuCl2 dosing, daily oral Cu gluconate was started and DSF continued until disease progression as defined by Prostate Cancer Working Group Three (PCWG3). DSF and metabolite MeDDC levels in plasma were sampled at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours after the first dose and on Cycle 2 Day 1, and measured by HPLC. DSF and MeDDC were evaluated for cytotoxicity in 3 PC cell lines (22Rv1, LnCAP, and PC3) and a prostate epithelial cell line (PWR-1E). mCRPC Cu avidity was measured by 64Cu PET scan at baseline for all pts. Results: We treated 9 pts with mCRPC, 6 on cohort B and 3 on cohort C. No confirmed PSA declines or radiographic responses were observed in either cohort. Common adverse events included fatigue and psychomotor depression; no grade 4/5 AEs were observed. PK analysis: No DSF was detected in plasma (LOQ = 0.032 ng/mL, LOD = 0.01 ng/mL), whereas MeDDC was measurable in all study samples (LOQ = 0.512 ng/mL). MeDDC exhibited no cytotoxicity activity in PC cell lines. On 64Cu PET scans, bone metastases showed differential and heterogeneous Cu uptake. Lymph node and pulmonary metastases were evaluable, but not liver metastases due to significant Cu uptake in the liver. Conclusions: Oral DSF is not an effective treatment for mCRPC because it is quickly metabolized into the non-cytotoxic inactive metabolite, MeDDC. As such, this trial has stopped enrollment. Further work is needed to identify a stable DSF formulation so that the conditional lethality of Cu and DSF may be evaluated for treatment of mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02963051

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02963051

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 96)

Abstract #

96

Poster Bd #

D20

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts