Phase II trial of cytoreductive stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy with combination ipilimumab/nivolumab for metastatic kidney cancer (CYTOSHRINK).

Authors

null

Aly-Khan A. Lalani

Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Aly-Khan A. Lalani , Anand Swaminath , Gregory Russell Pond , Anil Kapoor , William Chu , Jonathan L. Bramson , Michael G. Surette , Mark Norman Levine , Sebastien J. Hotte

Organizations

Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, McMaster University, Department of Oncology, Hamilton, ON, Canada, McMaster Institute of Urology, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Mcmaster Immunology Research Center, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Other
Educational grant, Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Background: Randomized data from the interferon era demonstrated modest survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Results from SURTIME and CARMENA, conducted in the VEGF-targeted therapy era, have challenged the routine use of upfront CN especially in IMDC intermediate and poor risk patients. Furthermore, the treatment landscape in aRCC now includes first-line combination immunotherapy. Data from the Checkmate-214 trial showed that intermediate/poor risk patients have improved overall survival and objective response rate with ipilimumab and nivolumab (I/N) compared to sunitinib. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) provides a convenient method for cytoreduction of the primary kidney lesion and may induce an ‘abscopal effect’, leading to enhanced systemic anti-tumour immune response. We hypothesize that SBRT to the primary kidney mass in aRCC patients will enhance the efficacy of I/N compared to standard of care I/N alone. Methods: This phase II trial randomizes untreated aRCC patients in a 2:1 fashion to I/N plus SBRT (30-40 Gy in 5 fractions) to the primary kidney mass between cycles 1 and 2 (experimental arm, E), versus standard of care I/N alone (standard arm, S). Eligible patients have biopsy-proven aRCC (any histology), IMDC intermediate/poor risk disease, and who decline or are unsuitable for CN. Patients with a primary kidney lesion ≥ 20cm, previous abdominal radiation precluding SBRT, or who have a contraindication to I/N are excluded. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of I/N plus SBRT versus I/N alone, as determined by the hazard ratio for progression free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety, overall survival, objective response rate, and health-related quality of life. Exploratory analyses include blood immune signatures and stool microbiome. Up to 78 patients will be enrolled under the assumption of an improved 12-month PFS from 50% (S) to 75% (E), using a two-sided α=0.1, power=80%, and accounting for loss-to-follow-up and stratification using IMDC criteria 1-2 vs 3-6. Clinical trial information: NCT04090710

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Trials in Progress Poster Session

Session Title

Trials in Progress Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04090710

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr TPS761)

Abstract #

TPS761

Poster Bd #

K17

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Aly-Khan A. Lalani

First Author: Aly-Khan A. Lalani

First Author: Hannah Johnson Roberts

First Author: Alice Markussen