PDIGREE: An adaptive phase III trial of PD-inhibitor nivolumab and ipilimumab (IPI-NIVO) with VEGF TKI cabozantinib (CABO) in metastatic untreated renal cell cancer (Alliance A031704).

Authors

Tian Zhang

Tian Zhang

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

Tian Zhang , Karla V. Ballman , Atish Dipankar Choudhury , Ronald C. Chen , Colleen Watt , Yujia Wen , Tyler Zemla , Hamid Emamekhoo , Ulka N. Vaishampayan , Michael J. Morris , Daniel J. George , Toni K. Choueiri

Organizations

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL, Univ of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Background: First-line treatment of mRCC has rapidly changed to include IPI-NIVO or CABO, with clinical benefit of each based on the Checkmate 214 and CABOSUN trials. Combination immunotherapy with VEGF therapies have shown benefit in the JAVELIN 101 and KEYNOTE 426 trials over sunitinib. It is yet unclear which patients (pts) benefit most from combination immunotherapy-VEGF inhibitors, and the optimal sequence of drugs. Methods: In an adaptive, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 trial (Alliance A031704, PDIGREE), pts start treatment with induction IPI 1mg/kg and NIVO 3mg/kg intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks. Key inclusion criteria include clear cell mRCC, IMDC intermediate or poor risk, Karnofsky performance status >70, and no prior treatments for mRCC. Based on 3-month radiographic assessment (after completing IPI-NIVO combination), pts with complete responses (CR) undergo maintenance NIVO 480mg IV every 4 weeks, pts with progression of disease (PD) switch to CABO 60mg oral daily, and pts with non-CR/non-PD are randomized to NIVO 480mg IV every 4 weeks versus NIVO 480mg IV every 4 weeks with CABO 40mg oral daily. Randomization is stratified by IMDC risk criteria and presence of bone metastases. The primary endpoint of the study is overall survival (OS). We hypothesize that 3-year OS rate will improve to 70% for NIVO-CABO compared to 60% for NIVO alone; to achieve 85% power with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and exponential distribution, 696 patients will be randomized. Accounting for 30% patients with either CR or PD, and 5% dropout from toxicity, up to 1046 pts will be enrolled. Key secondary endpoints include PFS, 12-month CR rate, ORR based on RECIST 1.1 and irRECIST criteria, and toxicity profiles. Quality of life will be assessed based on the FKSI-19, PROMIS-fatigue, and EQ5D-5L questionnaires. Biomarkers associated with CR and association of IL-6 with treatment benefit will be assessed. Other tissue-based and plasma-based biomarkers are planned. Updated enrollment will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03793166

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Trials in Progress Poster Session

Session Title

Trials in Progress Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03793166

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr TPS760)

Abstract #

TPS760

Poster Bd #

K16

Abstract Disclosures