Prostate cancer survivorship care plans: What we are failing to tell men after treatment?

Authors

Youngjee Choi

Youngjee Choi

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Youngjee Choi , Katherine C. Smith , Aishwarya Shukla , Amanda L. Blackford , Phuoc T. Tran , Kimberly S. Peairs , Thomas M. DeMarco , Amanda Choflet , Kristen Farling , Madeline Kelso , Michael Anthony Carducci , Nancy Mayonado , Elliott Tolbert , Claire Frances Snyder

Organizations

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Richard A. Henson Cancer Institute, Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Salisbury, MD, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Richard A. Henson Research Institute, Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Salisury, MD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

Other Government Agency
PCORI.

Background: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) present essential information about cancer treatment and follow-up recommendations for cancer survivors. We describe the completeness of prostate cancer SCPs and evaluate guideline concordance of follow-up recommendations. Methods: We analyzed 125 prostate cancer SCPs from an academic and community cancer center, abstracting demographics, cancer/treatment details and follow-up recommendations. Follow-up recommendations were compared to national guidelines. Results: Content provided in >90% of SCPs included cancer TNM stage; PSA at diagnosis; radiation treatment details (98% of men received radiation); and PSA monitoring recommendations. Potential treatment-specific side effects were listed for 69% of men who had surgery, 78% for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and 97% for radiation. The presence of post-treatment symptoms were noted in 67% of plans – several ADT-related side effects (e.g., bone thinning, cognitive changes, muscle atrophy) were noted for 0/21 men who completed all ADT. Guidelines recommend an annual digital rectal exam (DRE) with no physical exam otherwise specified. No SCPs specified DRE, but all 68 SCPs at the community site recommended at least annual follow-up visits with urology, radiation oncology, and primary care. Only 5/57 SCPs at the academic site specified follow-up visits (radiation oncology every 6 months). Guidelines recommend PSA testing every 6-12 months (optional 3 months if high risk) for 5 years, then annually; while duration was not specified in any SCPs, if applied to the first 5 years, 91% of SCP recommendations were guideline concordant, 7% suggested oversurveillance, and 2% were incomplete. In men who received ADT, guidelines recommend assessing bone density (by imaging or FRAX score), and goal testosterone level. Of 80 men who completed or had ongoing ADT, 2% were recommended for bone density imaging (0 had FRAX scores) and 19% for testosterone levels. Conclusions: SCP content is more complete for demographic and treatment summary information with gaps in addressing treatment effects and follow-up recommendations beyond PSA testing. These findings highlight the need to improve the quality of information in SCPs. Clinical trial information: NCT03035773

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03035773

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 311)

Abstract #

311

Poster Bd #

L17

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Abdenour Nabid

First Author: Wee Loon Ong

First Author: Daniel Eidelberg Spratt