Impact of upstream use of novel hormonal therapy on progression of patients (pts) to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the United States (US).

Authors

null

Howard I. Scher

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Howard I. Scher , Fred Saad , Maneesha Mehra , Sandhya Nair , Lindsay Dearden , Ravi C. Potluri

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, SmartAnalyst Inc., New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Janssen Research & Development

Background: Novel hormonal therapies (nHTs) provide significant delay in disease progression in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and non-metastatic (nm)CRPC. The impact of earlier use of these agents on the epidemiological burden of PC in the US was assessed. Methods: A disease stage transition model capturing pt flow through eight clinical states and tracking pt treatment history was used, with each nHT being used once. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data for each drug/regimen were derived from published sources where available. We analyzed scenarios 1) no nHTs and 2) with nHTs: (abiraterone acetate + prednisone [AAP], apalutamide [APA] and enzalutamide [ENZA] in high-risk mCSPC, and APA and ENZA in low-risk mCSPC and in high-risk nmCRPC). Resultant state progression parameters were compared, evaluating the impact of nHTs. The assumed nHT utilization was 17.2% in high-risk mCSPC, 7.1% in low-risk mCSPC, and 60.0% in high-risk nmCRPC. Results: For 2018, the model resulted in PC incidence of 240,150 and prevalence of 2,445,173; 49,450 pts progressed to mCRPC, 42% from PSA biochemical recurrence, 31% from mCSPC, and 27% from nmCRPC states. Longer PFS and OS afforded by novel treatments extended the mean time spent from 4.4 to 4.7 yrs in mCSPC and from 2.4 to 3.0 yrs in nmCRPC. This further resulted in reduction in inflow to mCRPC over 2019 – 2025 (table). Conclusions: Novel hormonal therapies are currently used earlier in PC, a trend anticipated to intensify. The disease model shows this change in the treatment paradigm to result in delaying progression to mCRPC and increasing OS in PC.

Inflow of pts into mCRPC from clinical states with nHT use.

Clinical state2019202220252019-2025
Without nHTsnmCRPC high risk7,7918,0768,28456,413
mCSPC high risk3,3263,4873,65424,418
mCSPC low risk12,50612,94913,57190,914
With nHTsnmCRPC high risk7,3386,8367,54549,710
mCSPC high risk3,3723,4263,55824,118
mCSPC low risk12,27212,65113,09688,630
Reduction in inflow, %nmCRPC high risk5.815.48.911.9
mCSPC high risk-1.41.72.61.2
mCSPC low risk1.92.33.52.5

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 92)

Abstract #

92

Poster Bd #

D16

Abstract Disclosures