A real-world analysis of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed and platinum.

Authors

null

Himani Agg

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

Himani Agg, Katherine B. Winfree, Yajun Emily Zhu, Catherine Muehlenbein

Organizations

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Eli Lilly and Company

Background: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) is used in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ NSCLC) as monotherapy and in combination with pemetrexed and platinum agent (Pembro+Pem+Plat). Pembro monotherapy is approved for patients whose tumors express PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥ 1% while triplet therapy is approved regardless of PD-L1 TPS. These 2 regimens have not been compared in a head-to-head trial, and real world (RW) treatment pattern data are lacking. This study used RW data to describe patients who received Pembro or Pembro+Pem+Plat and associated overall survival (OS). Methods: This retrospective observational study selected adult patients with diagnosis of advanced NSQ NSCLC who started first-line treatment with Pembro or Pembro+Pem+Plat between Mar. 2015- Aug. 2018 in Flatiron Health’s electronic health record-derived database. Patient characteristics were summarized descriptively, and the Kaplan-Meier survival method was used (unadjusted). Results: A total of 1137 patients received Pembro (median age 72 years) and 1068 patients received Pembro+Pem+Plat (median age 67 years). Patient characteristics are shown in the Table. Median OS was 11.9 months for the Pembro cohort and 14.3 months for the Pembro+Pem+Plat cohort. Median OS by PD-L1 TPS was TPS < 1%: 8.8 months for Pembro and 9.5 months for Pembro+Pem+Plat, TPS 1-49%: 8.9 months for Pembro and not reached (NR) for Pembro+Pem+Plat, and TPS ≥50%: 13.4 months for Pembro and NR for Pembro+Pem+Plat. Conclusions: These RW data seem to suggest baseline differences between the population with Pembro and Pembro+Pem+Plat with regard to age, PS, disease stage, as well as PD-L1 status. Those baseline differences may play a role in the clinicians’ choice of the two treatment options for the NSCLC patients.

Pembrolizumab n = 1137Pembro+Pem+Plat n = 1068
ECOG PS#0 or 144.5%59.7%
>221.1%12.9%
Missing34.4%27.3%
Stage IV at initial diagnosis77.5%86.9%
PD-L1 TPS< 1%1.8%26.2%
1-49%7.1%24.5%
≥50%70.6%20.6%
Unknown20.5%28.8%
Median follow-up days151.5112

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Breast and Gynecologic Cancers,Developmental Therapeutics,Genitourinary Cancer,Head and Neck Cancer,Lung Cancer,Melanoma/Skin Cancers,Gastrointestinal Cancer,Combination Studies,Implications for Patients and Society,Miscellaneous Cancers,Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Immune Checkpoints and Stimulatory Receptors

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 5; abstr 53)

Abstract #

53

Poster Bd #

C2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts