A network meta-analysis of immunotherapy-based regimens for first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors

null

Himani Agg

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

Himani Agg, Kerigo Ndirangu, Catherine Muehlenbein, Katherine B. Winfree, Yajun Emily Zhu, Howard Thom, Vanita Tongbram

Organizations

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, ICON Plc, New York, NY, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Eli Lilly and Company.

Background: Immunotherapy (IO) for initial treatment of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsqNSCLC) has led to improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) vs chemotherapy. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy of IO-based therapies to chemotherapy in the first-line treatment until progression for advanced nsqNSCLC. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials reporting PFS and/or OS data in adult patients who received first-line treatment for stage IIIB or IV nsqNSCLC until progression. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register were searched from the start of databases to June 2018. The NMA used fixed-effects models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and credible intervals (Crl) for PFS and OS of IO therapies vs pemetrexed + platinum. A subgroup of patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% was also analysed. Results: Evidence networks comprised of 18 studies for the overall population and 3 studies for the PD-L1 TPS ≥50% subgroup. In PFS analysis for the overall population, HRs were lower for atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel + platinum (HR 0.62; 95% CrI 0.48, 0.8), ipilimumab + nivolumab (HR 0.55; 95% CrI 0.38, 0.8) and pemetrexed + pembrolizumab + platinum regimens (HR 0.52; 95% CrI 0.43, 0.63) vs pemetrexed + platinum. In the PD-L1 TPS ≥50% subgroup, PFS HRs were lower for pembrolizumab (HR 0.81; 95% CrI 0.67, 0.98) and pemetrexed + pembrolizumab + platinum (HR 0.36; 95% CrI 0.25, 0.52) vs pemetrexed + platinum. In the OS analysis for the overall population, pemetrexed + pembrolizumab + platinum had a lower HR (HR 0.5; 95% CrI 0.4, 0.64) vs pemetrexed + platinum. This difference in OS was magnified in the PD-L1 TPS ≥50% subgroup (HR 0.42; 95% CrI 0.26, 0.68). Conclusions: Among all IO-based therapies in this analysis, pemetrexed + pembrolizumab + platinum had the highest PFS and OS benefit vs pemetrexed + platinum in the first-line treatment until progression for advanced nsqNSCLC for both the overall population and high PD-L1 subgroup. These comparative efficacy data may inform clinicians in treatment selection.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Breast and Gynecologic Cancers,Developmental Therapeutics,Genitourinary Cancer,Head and Neck Cancer,Lung Cancer,Melanoma/Skin Cancers,Gastrointestinal Cancer,Combination Studies,Implications for Patients and Society,Miscellaneous Cancers,Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Immune Checkpoints and Stimulatory Receptors

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 5; abstr 52)

Abstract #

52

Poster Bd #

C1

Abstract Disclosures