Prospective comparison of 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT for initial staging of prostate cancer.

Authors

null

Romain Schollhammer Sr.

Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

Romain Schollhammer Sr., Henri De Clermont-Gallerande Sr., Gregoire Robert Sr., Mokrane Yacoub Sr., Frederic Lamare , Nicolas Balamoutoff , Delphine Vimont , Elif Hindie Sr., Philippe Fernandez Sr., Clément Morgat Sr.

Organizations

Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, Urology Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, CNRS, INCIA, UMR 5287, Talence, France

Research Funding

Other
CHU de Bordeaux and Groupement interrgional de recherche clinique et d'innovation - Sud-ouest, Outre-mer, hospitalier.

Background: PSMA (Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen) and GRP-R (Gastrin Releasing Peptide Receptor) are overexpressed on prostatic cancer cells and can be targeted with a PSMA inhibitor such as 68Ga-PSMA-617 (Liu 2018) or a GRP-R antagonist such as 68Ga-RM2 (Touijer 2019). We aimed to compare 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT and 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT at initial staging of prostate cancer. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 10 treatment-naïve patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Fifteen lesions were found (two with Gleason score (GS) 6; seven GS 7(3+4), two GS 7(4+3) and four GS ≥ 8). 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT and 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT were randomly performed before prostatectomy with imaging at 1 and 2 hours after injection (2MBq/kg). Manual (MS) and automatic (AS) segmentation were performed on each PET imaging and then compared to histology (standard-of- truth). Prostatectomy samples were analyzed by an experimented pathologist who identified and staged each lesion according to GS. Each prostatectomy slice available was scanned for comparison between PET and histologic segmentation. Uptake intensity (SUVmax) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) relative to non-lesional prostate gland parenchyma were analyzed. Per-lesion analysis was performed on final GS (prostatectomy). Results: Using AS, 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT showed better sensitivity (Se) than 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT: (0.85 vs 0.75) and better specificity (Sp) (0.89 vs 0.60). MS found similar Se (0.94 vs 0.93) but better Sp (0.89 vs 0.80) with 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT. SNR of 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT was high whatever the GS was; while 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT exhibited higher SNR in high GS (p = 0.044). Finally, in low GS, SNR of 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT was significantly higher than 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT (p = 0.004). Conclusions: GRP-R-targeting and PSMA-targeting have been previously compared in patients with biochemically recurrence (Minamimoto 2016) but not at primary staging. Our initial results, in this indication, showed great diagnostic performance of 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT compared to 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT to characterize low Gleason score tumors. 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT is promising for initial staging of high Gleason score tumors. These results need to be confirmed in a larger study.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Imaging

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 21)

Abstract #

21

Poster Bd #

A9

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jose Mauricio Mota

Abstract

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Utility of PSMA PET/CT for imaging ductal carcinoma of the prostate.

First Author: Ahmed M. Mahmoud

First Author: Michael Leapman