Abiraterone acetate (AA) with or without cabazitaxel (CBZ) in treatment of chemotherapy naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Authors

null

Susan F. Slovin

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Susan F. Slovin , Karen E. Knudsen , Susan Halabi , Mark T. Fleming , Ana M. Molina , Steven Paul Wolf , Renee de Leeuw , Celina Fernandez , Praneet Kang , Traci Southwell , Carol L. Jones , Escarleth Fernandez , William Kevin Kelly

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, Virginia Oncology Associates, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Chicago, IL, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk, VA, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Sanofi US Services, Inc, Other Foundation

Background: Loss of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) function has been shown to lead to CRPC and is strongly associated with poor outcome. RB functions as a transcriptional repressor; as such, loss of RB causes de-repression of pro-tumorigenic gene networks, including deregulation of the androgen receptor (AR) locus, excessive AR production, and castration-resistant (ligand independent) AR activity that can bypass hormone therapy. Our hypothesis is that leveraging RB status can direct treatment decisions. The primary objective of the trial (NCT02218606) was to determine the radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) of AA/prednisone (AAP) with and without CBZ in mCRPC patients (pts) that have progressed on primary androgen deprivation therapy and no prior AR directed therapy or chemotherapy. Methods: This is a multicenter non-comparative randomized phase 2 trial. Pts were randomized 1:1 to AAP with crossover to CBZ upon AAP failure (Arm 1), or the combination of AAP + CBZ (Arm 2). Randomization was stratified by the CALGB 90401 prognostic risk groups. The primary endpoint was rPFS (time from randomization to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurs first). Arms were analyzed separately. Results: Between October 2014 and March 2019, 93 pts were accrued; 81 were randomized. Median age was 68 years and ECOG performance status was 0 or 1. Endpoints are shown in Table. Therapies were well tolerated. Conclusions: Results of AAP + CBZ (Arm 2) in chemotherapy naïve pts suggest that men may derive benefit from the earlier use of CBZ with acceptable toxicity, supporting further study of this combination in mCRPC pts. Circulating Tumor Cells are being analyzed for changes in RB/AR expression. Managed by: Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium; Funding: Sanofi US; Support: Prostate Cancer Foundation.Clinical trial information: NCT02218606

Trial Endpoints (Median [95% CI]).

EndpointArm 1
(n=42)
Arm 2
(n=39)
rPFS, months7.9 (4.6, 12.3)14.4 (10.3, 20.5)
PSA Progression, months8.3 (6.4, 13.4)13.6 (10.6, 19.0)
Overall Survival, months17 (14, NR)Not Reached
≥50% Decline in PSA from Baseline45.2% (29.9-61.3)87.2% (72.6%, 95.7%)
rPFS, Hazard Ratio0.5 (0.3, 0.9)0.5 (0.3, 0.9)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02218606

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 84)

Abstract #

84

Poster Bd #

D8

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts