Univsersity of Colorado, Aurora, CO
Ashley Elizabeth Glode , Tyler Friedrich , Gurprataap Singh Sandhu , Whitney Herter , Martin McCarter , Ana Luiza Gleisner , Elisa Birnbaum , Steven Arthur Ahrendt , Jon Vogel , Karyn A. Goodman , Tracey E. Schefter , William T. Purcell , Alexis Diane Leal , Gentry Teng King , S. Lindsey Davis , Stephen Leong , Wells A. Messersmith , Christopher Hanyoung Lieu
Background: Patients with clinical stage II or III locally advanced rectal cancer may be treated with the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach; chemotherapy with 4 mths of FOLFOX followed by chemoradiation (chemo/XRT) with capecitabine for 5 wks administered before surgery. We hypothesized that full dose intensity is not necessary for treatment benefit. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer recommended to receive TNT by the multidisciplinary (multiD) colorectal cancer tumor board at the University of Colorado Cancer Center (UCCC). The primary objective was to evaluate dose intensity of TNT and its impact on response assessed by biopsy and/or imaging (MRI). Results: Between January 31, 2016 and January 31, 2019, 80 patients were recommended the TNT approach for cancer management by the multiD team. Of those, 48 completed their neoadjuvant treatment at UCCC and were included in the analysis. The average age was 55 years (range 23-80) and 61% were male. Thirty-one patients had an ECOG of 0 and 17 had an ECOG of 1. Overall responses were 44% complete response (CR, n = 21), 15% near complete response (nCR, n = 7), 35% partial response (PR, n = 17), and 6% no response (NR, n = 3). See Table for responses seen by dose intensity for chemotherapy. Two patients did not receive their full planned XRT course, and 9 patients had their capecitabine doses held/decreased during chemoradiation. Conclusions: This single center retrospective analysis of patients receiving the TNT approach for rectal cancer provides data supporting that achieving full dose intensity is not necessary to achieve treatment benefit.
FOLFOX | Fluorouracil Bolus (400 mg/m2) | Fluorouracil CIVI (2400 mg/m2) | Leucovorin (400 mg/m2) |
Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Population (n = 43) | 64.9% | 95% | 89% | 87.9% |
Complete Response (n = 19) | 63.4% | 96.9% | 95% | 86.6% |
Near Complete Response (n = 7) | 61.8% | 100% | 82% | 89.7% |
Partial Response (14) | 72.4% | 95.7% | 93.5% | 89% |
No Response (n = 3) | 45.8% | 97.9% | 458% | 86.1% |
CapeOx | Capecitabine (2000 mg/m2/day) |
Oxaliplatin
(130 mg/m2) |
||
Total Population (n = 5) | 50.6% | 60.1% | ||
Complete Response (n = 2) | 49.8% | 73.2% | ||
Partial Response (n = 3) | 51% | 51.4% |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Meng Wang
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Manish A. Shah
2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Jun Watanabe
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Janice Zhao