Outcomes and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy in localized pancreatic cancer.

Authors

null

Asmita Chopra

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Asmita Chopra , Jacob C. Hodges , Adam Olson , Steven A. Burton , Kenneth K. Lee , Nathan Bahary , Aatur D. Singhi , Brian A. Boone , Michael T. Lotze , Melissa E. Hogg , Herbert Zeh III, Amer H. Zureikat

Organizations

Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Wolff Center at UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Chicago, IL, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used for pancreatic cancer (PDA). The comparative efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) versus chemoradiation (NCRT) remains uncertain. We aimed to compare NC and NCRT on survival outcomes and pathologic endpoints of PDA. Methods: Single-center analysis of PDAs treated with NC or NCRT between 2008-2018. Average treatment effects (ATE) were estimated after matching cases to controls using Mahalanobis distance nearest-neighbor matching. Competing risk survival analysis and inverse probability weighted estimates (IPWE) were used for disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) respectively. Results: Of 418 patients (median age 67yrs, 51% females), 327 received NC and 91 received NCRT. NCRT patients had more locally advanced disease, cross-over NC regimens (gemcitabine & 5-FU based), longer neoadjuvant therapy duration, open surgery and vascular resection (all p < 0.05). NCRT was associated with lower LN positivity, LNR, LVI and PNI, higher R0 rates, and higher near complete and complete pathologic responses (all p < 0.05, table). After adjustment, NCRT was associated with a significant reduction in LN positivity [95%CI = (-)0.41-(-)0.07; p = 0.007] and LVI [95%CI = (-)0.36-(-)0.03; p = 0.02]. While NCRT was associated with improved OS on UVA (25.5 vs. 21.6 months; p = 0.04), it was not significantly associated with OS by IPWE after adjusting for adjuvant therapy [95%CI = (-)5.02-16.3; p = 0.3] or DFS on competing risk analysis (95%CI = 0.78-1.31; p = 0.96). Conclusions: Although NCRT is associated with improved pathologic surrogates, it is not associated with improved survival in PDA.

VariablesNC (N = 327)NCRT (N = 91)p-value (UVA)p-value (MVA)
T size (cm)2.5 (2.0, 3.2)2.5 (1.6, 3)0.130.46
Lymph node ratio (LNR)0.05 (0.0, 0.14)0.03 (0.0, 0.12)0.040.14
LN positive230 (70.3)47 (51.6)0.0010.007
Positive Margin (R1<1mm)173 (52.9)34 (37.4)0.0080.22
Lymphovascular invasion (LVI)240 (76.7)49 (57.0)< 0.0010.02
Perineural invasion (PNI)274 (85.1)64 (70.3)0.0020.21
Near-complete/ complete response12(3.8)11 (14.1)< 0.0010.13
DFS (months)15.1 (10.7, 24.5)17.0 (11.2, 31.5)0.0560.96
OS (months)21.6 (14.3, 35.4)27.5 (14.9, 54.9)0.0420.3

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Hepatobiliary Cancer, Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid, Pancreatic Cancer, and Small Bowel Cancer

Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer,Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid,Pancreatic Cancer,Small Bowel Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr 727)

Abstract #

727

Poster Bd #

L16

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Mary P. Martos

First Author: Hiromichi Shirasu