Prospective DPYD testing and dose adjustment in colorectal cancer patients prior to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy: Experience in a regional cancer center.

Authors

null

Janet Shirley Graham

Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Janet Shirley Graham , Jocelyn Saunders , Gregory Naylor , Christine Crearie , Wendy Campbell , Tareq Abdullah , Mary G. Dunn , Nicholas James MacLeod , Alec McDonald , Gillian McGaffin , Anne Jane McKillop , Laura Miller , Nazia Mohammed , Aqilah Othman , Liz Radford , Karen Smith , Dawn Jane Storey , Nicola Williams , Paul Westwood , Richard H. Wilson

Organizations

Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom, University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom, West of Scotland Cancer Network, Glasgow, United Kingdom, CRUK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, United Kingdom, West of Scotland Genetics Services, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK Glasgow Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Govan Road, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other Government Agency
Hospital funds

Background: The fluoropyrimidines (FP), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine are a mainstay of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), an enzyme encoded by the DPYD gene, is the initial and rate-limiting step in pyrimidine catabolism, deactivating over 80% of 5-FU. Approximately 5% of the population are deficient in DPYD and can develop severe or fatal FP toxicities. Currently, few national guidelines recommend routine prospective DPYD testing. In July 2019, we commenced a 6 month prospective pilot, testing DPYD status of all CRC patients undergoing first FP treatment in a large regional cancer centre. Methods: All CRC patients eligible for first exposure to FP are tested using a rapid molecular assay screening for five SNPs (detects 70% of DPYD mutations) and we will present data on prevalence of each. We will use electronic chemotherapy prescribing records (July 19-Jan 20) to collect information on dose modifications and toxicities. Once the pilot is completed we will perform a cost-effectiveness analysis. Results: Data from the first 3 months of this pilot have been reviewed and 201 patients have been tested with 15 heterozygotes identified, of which 2 had more than one mutation. No homozygotes were found. All heterozygote patients are started with a dose reduction (or have alternative therapy). One patient treated at 50% dose was hospitalised with several grade 3 toxicities despite dose reduction. Two patients have had subsequent dose escalation (by 25%). Nine patients have received one dose reduced cycle without complication. Three patients are due to start dose-reduced treatment. Conclusions: Routine prospective testing of DPYD status in a large regional cancer centre is feasible and with a sufficiently swift result turnaround to permit up-front dose modification. Detailed toxicity analysis and cost-effectiveness data will be presented.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Anal and Colorectal Cancer

Track

Colorectal Cancer,Anal Cancer

Sub Track

Symptoms, Toxicities, and Whole-Person Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr 93)

Abstract #

93

Poster Bd #

E1

Abstract Disclosures