A randomized study evaluating tailoring of advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) therapy using circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) (TACT-D).

Authors

Kanwal Raghav

Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav , Xin Shelley Wang , Lianchun Xiao , Arvind Dasari , Van K. Morris II, Benny Johnson , John Paul Y.C. Shen , Christine Megerdichian Parseghian , Bryan K. Kee , Imad Shureiqi , David R. Fogelman , Robert A. Wolff , Victoria M. Raymond , Justin I. Odegaard , Richard B. Lanman , Michael J. Overman , Scott Kopetz

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Guardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA

Research Funding

Other
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX & Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, CA

Background: Identifying non-responders to expensive salvage therapies with modest benefits and substantial treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) (e.g. regorafenib/TAS102 in mCRC) is necessary to maximize benefits and limit toxicities. Serial ctDNA sequencing is reliable for tracking tumor dynamics and appears to predict resistance to therapy earlier than radiographic progression. Methods: TACT-D is a randomized study (N = 100) to validate the ability of changes in ctDNA (ΔctDNA) to predict resistance early and in limiting toxicities. We hypothesize that increase in ctDNA (measured by variant allele fraction) at 2 weeks (wk) into treatment can predict resistance earlier than standard radiographic means [at 8-12 wk] and detecting resistance early can enable prompt change in therapy resulting in reduction of TRAEs. Pts with mCRC eligible for either regorafenib/TAS102 are randomized 2:1 to either standard of care (SOC) or ctDNA arm. On SOC arm, treatment is given as per current paradigm i.e. for 8 wk and then restaging. On ctDNA arm, decision to continue therapy is based on ctDNA change between baseline and 2 weeks [ΔctDNA = ctDNA (C1D15 – C1D1)]. Increase in ctDNA triggers early radiographic staging (4 wk). Treatment is continued for disease stability/regression and discontinued for progression. Study has 2 co-primary endpoints: 1) Association of Δ ctDNA and radiographic progression [62 pts on SOC arm, have 94% power (2-sided α 0.05) to detect difference of 95% vs. 58% in progressive disease between pts with increase vs decrease in ctDNA] and 2) Compare proportion of pts experiencing TRAEs within 4 months between study arms [67 in SOC arm and 33 in ctDNA arm have 82% power (2-sided α 0.05) to detect a 30% decrease in toxicity]. Key secondary endpoints include: patient-reported outcomes (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and PRO-CTCAE), OS, clinical events of special interest (hospitalizations/ER visits/medical interventions such as blood transfusions/IV hydration), clinical trial referral and cost effectiveness. Study is now actively accruing pts (NCT03844620). Funding: MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX & Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, CA. Clinical trial information: NCT03844620

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Trials in Progress Poster Session

Session Title

Trials in Progress Poster Session C: Anal and Colorectal Cancer

Track

Colorectal Cancer,Anal Cancer

Sub Track

Translational Research

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03844620

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr TPS277)

Abstract #

TPS277

Poster Bd #

N11

Abstract Disclosures