Pattern of progression in advanced HCC treated with ramucirumab/placebo: Results from two randomized phase III trials (REACH/REACH-2).

Authors

Maria Reig

Maria Reig

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Barcelona, Spain

Maria Reig , Peter R. Galle , Masatoshi Kudo , Richard S. Finn , Josep M. Llovet , William R. Schelman , Kun Liang , Chunxiao Wang , Ryan C. Widau , Paolo Abada , Andrew X. Zhu

Organizations

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Barcelona, Spain, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Eli Lilly and Company

Background: REACH (NCT01140347) and REACH-2 (NCT02435433) studied ramucirumab (RAM) in pts with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following sorafenib; REACH-2 enrolled pts with baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL, and met its primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) for RAM vs placebo. This post-hoc analysis examined radiological progression patterns (RPP) incidence every 6 weeks per RECIST v1.1, and if RPP were related to OS and post-progression survival (PPS). Methods: Pts with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A, and ECOG PS 0-1 with prior sorafenib were randomized (REACH 1:1; REACH-2 2:1) to receive RAM 8 mg/kg or placebo Q2W. Among pts with ≥1 RPP (new extrahepatic lesion [NEH], new intrahepatic lesion [NIH], extrahepatic growth [EHG], or intrahepatic growth [IHG]), results were analyzed by trial and for pooled individual patient data of REACH-2 and REACH (AFP ≥400 ng/mL). Cox models evaluated treatment effect of RPP on OS, and prognostic implications of RPP on OS (adjusting baseline ECOG PS, AFP, macrovascular invasion, arm) and on PPS (adjusting ECOG PS, AFP at progression). Results: RPP incidence in the pooled population was: NEH 39%; NIH 24%; EHG 39%; IHG 37%. When examining NEH vs other RPP, PPS was worse among those with NEH in REACH (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.51, 3.60), REACH-2 (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.72, 3.08), and the pooled data (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.12, 2.74). Use of post-discontinuation therapy may have influenced results. OS was also significantly reduced in those with NEH across studies (Table). RAM provided OS benefit in the pooled population, including pts with NEH (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39, 0.80). Conclusions: Acknowledging limitations of post-randomization RPP analysis, the emergence of NEH on RAM or placebo may be an independent poor prognostic factor for PPS. The impact of RAM on OS was consistent across all RPP subgroups. Clinical trial information: NCT01140347 and NCT02435433

Multivariate Cox models (HR [95% CI]) of OS by RPP.

RPP Pattern vs All Others REACH REACH-2 Pooled
(AFP ≥400 ng/mL)
N=414 N=211 N=398
NEH 1.84 (1.24, 2.73) 1.94 (1.05, 3.60) 1.89 (1.27, 2.83)
NIH 1.10 (0.73, 1.66) 1.55 (0.67, 3.58) 1.24 (0.76, 2.02)
EHG 1.08 (0.75, 1.55) 1.31 (0.71, 2.43) 1.12 (0.75, 1.67)
IHG 1.08 (0.75, 1.57) 1.68 (0.95, 2.97) 1.48 (1.01, 2.16)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Hepatobiliary Cancer, Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid, Pancreatic Cancer, and Small Bowel Cancer

Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer,Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid,Pancreatic Cancer,Small Bowel Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01140347 and NCT02435433

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr 544)

Abstract #

544

Poster Bd #

D5

Abstract Disclosures