First-line durvalumab + monalizumab, mFOLFOX6, and bevacizumab or cetuximab for metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC).

Authors

null

Zev A. Wainberg

UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

Zev A. Wainberg , Jennifer Robinson Diamond , Giuseppe Curigliano , Sanjeev Deva , Johanna C. Bendell , Sae-Won Han , Aparna Kalyan , Jarushka Naidoo , Richard D. Kim , Sandip Pravin Patel , Panagiotis Kourtesis , Xia Li , Maria Ascierto , Xuyang Song , Mayukh Das , Neil Howard Segal

Organizations

UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, University of Colorado–Denver, Denver, CO, University of Milano, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, The Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, Seoul University National Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, University of California San Diego Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AstraZeneca

Background: Targeting multiple immune checkpoint pathways and combining checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy may enhance response in MSS-CRC. In a Phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label study, the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab (D) was added to monalizumab (M; an anti-NKG2A antibody). In dose-exploration cohorts, D+M was added to chemotherapy and a biologic agent (bevacizumab [DMCB] or cetuximab [DMCC]) for first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic MSS-CRC. Initial data showed DMCB was well tolerated and clinically active. Here we report updated efficacy and safety of DMCB and initial safety of DMCC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had MSS-CRC (RAS/BRAF wt with a left-sided colon primary tumor in the DMCC cohort) and ECOG PS 0–1. They received D 1500 mg Q4W, M 750 mg Q2W, mFOLFOX6 Q2W and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg Q2W or cetuximab 250/400 mg/m2 QW (up to 500 mg/m2 Q2W) for up to 3 yr. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included antitumor activity. Results: As of Aug 26, 2019, 18 pts received DMCB and 17 pts received DMCC. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 100.0% of the DMCB cohort (most commonly fatigue, nausea and peripheral neuropathy) and 94.1% of the DMCC cohort (most commonly peripheral neuropathy, rash and dermatitis acneiform). The AEs were grade 3/4 in 77.8% of pts receiving DMCB and 70.6% of pts receiving DMCC, and were serious in 38.9% and 47.1%, respectively. Response was evaluable in 17 pts receiving DMCB; objective response rate was 41.2% (all PRs; Table). Responses occurred early and the median duration of response has not yet been reached. Conclusions: In advanced/metastatic MSS-CRC, first-line DMCB and DMCC had a manageable safety profile and DMCB showed promising preliminary activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02671435

Antitumor response in the DMCB cohort.

N = 17
Best overall response, n (%)
Complete response 0
Partial response (PR) 7 (41.2)
Stable disease 8 (47.1)
Unconfirmed PR 2 (11.8)
Progressive disease 2 (11.8)
Median time to response, wk 15.4
Median duration of response, wk NR

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Anal and Colorectal Cancer

Track

Colorectal Cancer,Anal Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02671435

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr 128)

Abstract #

128

Poster Bd #

F14

Abstract Disclosures