Feasibility and clinical impact of routine molecular testing of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers at a tertiary center with a multigene, next generation sequencing (NGS) panel.

Authors

null

Giacomo Bregni

Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium

Giacomo Bregni , Tiberio Sticca , Tugba Akin Telli , Silvia Camera , Ligia Ioana Craciun , Leila Shaza , Amélie Deleruelle , Maëlle Anciaux , Godelieve Machiels , Amélie Deleporte , Caroline Vandeputte , Pieter Demetter , Denis Larsimont , Alain Hendlisz , Francesco Sclafani

Organizations

Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: High-throughput technologies have been increasingly used in research. Nevertheless, limited data are available on the feasibility and clinical value of these technologies in routine practice. Methods: All consecutive GI cancer patients (pts) who were tested with the 48-gene Truseq Amplicon Cancer Panel (Illumina) as part of routine practice at our Institution were identified from a prospectively maintained pathology database. Feasibility, results and impact on management decisions were analysed. Associations were tested with Fisher’s test. Results: From Apr 2014 to Jun 2019, 314 pts were tested. Sequencing was successful in 290 cases (92.4%; 234 colorectal (CRC), 21 gastro-esophageal, 17 bilio-pancreatic, 9 GIST, 4 appendix, 3 small intestine, 2 hepatocellular). In successful and failed cases, respectively, analyses were attempted on core biopsy (37.0% vs 66.7%), surgery (62.6% vs 16.7%), and fine needle aspiration (0.4% vs 12.4%) tumour samples (p < 0.001). Median turnaround time (TAT) was 12.5 days, reducing from 13 days in 2014 to 10 days in 2019. The majority of successfully tested pts (85.6%) had stage IV disease. TP53 was the most frequent mutation (45.9%), followed by APC (42.1%), KRAS (39.7%), PIK3CA (12.1%), SMAD4 (7.6%), BRAF (6.2%), and NRAS (5.5%). All other mutations were found in < 5% of cases. Excluding RAS/BRAF and KIT/PDGFR mutations, sequencing results impacted on the management of 4 (1.4%) pts. In 199 stage IV CRC pts, KRAS mutations were associated with lung (p = 0.020) and bone metastases (mts) (p = 0.008), NRAS mutations with liver mts (p = 0.021), BRAF mutations with peritoneal mts (p = 0.001), and APC mutations with lymph node mts (p = 0.006). Assuming a median of 25 samples per run, the estimated cost of NGS analysis per pt was €186. Conclusions: Low failure rate, short TAT and fair costs support feasibility of multi-gene NGS in routine practice. The clinical impact of this technology, however, is still limited but it could raise with the identification of new biologically relevant genetic alterations and the increased availability of novel therapeutics.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Anal and Colorectal Cancer

Track

Colorectal Cancer,Anal Cancer

Sub Track

Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr 216)

Abstract #

216

Poster Bd #

K16

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Frequency of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer in an Argentinian population.

First Author: Agustín Barbier

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Association of candidate alterations with primary resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in colorectal cancer.

First Author: Khalid Jazieh

First Author: Michael C. Burns

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Real-world analyses of BRAF alterations in patients with non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers.

First Author: Amit Mahipal