Prognostic value of risk stratification using blood biochemical parameters in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated by nivolumab.

Authors

null

Yoshiaki Yamamoto

Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan

Yoshiaki Yamamoto , Hideyasu Matsuyama , Hiroaki Matsumoto , Shigeru Sakano , Nakanori Fujii , Kazuo Oba , Mitsutaka Yamamoto , Yoriaki Kamiryo , Takeshi Hiragino , Kazuhiro Nagao , Kimio Takai , Akihiko Aoki , Satoru Yoshihiro , Manabu Tsukamoto , Jumpei Akao , Seiji Kitahara , Taku Misumi , Hirotaka Komatsu , Shintaro Oka , Akinobu Suga

Organizations

Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Japan, Department of Urology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyusyu, Japan, Department of Urology and Nephrology, Tokuyama Central Hospital, Shunan, Japan, Department of Urology, Saiseikai Yamaguchi General Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan, Department of Urology, Yamaguchi Grand Medical Center, Hofu, Japan, Department of Urology, Shimonoseki Saisekai Toyoura Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan, Department of Urology, Nagato General Hospital, Nagato, Japan, Shuto General Hospital, Yanai, Japan, Department of Urology, Saiseikai Shimonoseki General Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan, Department of Urology, Masuda Red Cross Hospital, Masuda, Japan, Department of Urology, Shimonoseki City Hospital, Shimonoseki, Japan, Department of Urology, Yamaguchi Red Cross Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan, Ogori Daiichi General Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan, Sanyo-Onoda Municipal Hospital, Sanyo-Onoda, Japan

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Nivolumab is a standard treatment for previously treated advanced renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). However, nivolumab is effective in only a limited number of patients; therefore, we evaluated the prognostic value of several biomarkers, including inflammation-based prognostic scores and changes in these scores following nivolumab treatment in Japanese patients with metastatic RCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 65 patients with previously treated metastatic RCC and who received nivolumab. MSKCC and IMDC risk, inflammation-based prognostic scores, including neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), and Glasgow prognostic score before and 6 weeks after the treatment were recorded. Categorical variables influencing disease-specific and overall survival were compared using Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Results: Univariate analysis showed that MSKCC risk score (P = 0.0052), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = 0.0266), LMR (P = 0.0113), and PLR (P = 0.0017) had a significant effect on disease-specific survival. Multivariate analyses showed that PLR and LDH were found to be independent prognostic factors for disease-specific survival (P = 0.0008, RR = 7.95, 95% CI, 2.16–51.64 and P = 0.0123, RR = 3.92, 95% CI, 1.37–10.80, respectively). The combination of PLR and LDH was the most significant prognostic biomarker in metastatic RCC for disease-specific (P< 0.0001) and overall (P< 0.0001) survival. Changes in LMR and PLR in response to nivolumab were significant prognostic factors for disease-specific survival (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0477, respectively). Conclusions: The combination of PLR and LDH may be a potential biomarker for estimating disease-specific and overall survival in Japanese patients with metastatic RCC treated by nivolumab. If changes of inflammation-based prognostic scores in response to nivolumab treatment might be improved, nivolumab treatment should be continued.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer

Track

Renal Cell Cancer

Sub Track

Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 6; abstr 724)

Abstract #

724

Poster Bd #

H22

Abstract Disclosures