Female representation in clinical trials leading to FDA cancer drug approvals for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers between 2008 to 2018.

Authors

Shehara Mendis

Shehara Ramyalini Mendis

BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Shehara Ramyalini Mendis , Seerat Anand , Arvind Dasari , Joseph M. Unger , Anirudh Gothwal , Lee M. Ellis , Gauri Rajani Varadhachary , Scott Kopetz , Michael J. Overman , Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav , Jonathan M. Loree

Organizations

BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, India, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, Baylor University, Waco, TX, MD Anderson Cancer Center and SWOG, Houston, TX

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Proportionate representation of women in health research is an area for improvement. This study aims to assess the representation of women in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer clinical trials leading to FDA cancer drug approvals over the past 10 years. Methods: FDA cancer drug approvals between 07/2008-06/2018 were identified and trial reports supporting approvals sourced. The ratio of female to male (F:M) enrollment was compared with F:M cancer incidence in the U.S., and U.S. cancer prevalence and mortality. Results: Although F:M enrollment for all 229 trials leading to FDA cancer drug approvals in this period was similar to overall F:M cancer incidence in the U.S. (0.89 vs 0.86; Odds Ratio for female enrollment (OR) 1.05, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.03-1.06, P<0.0001), in 17 trials that led to drug approvals in GI cancers there was lower F:M trial enrollment compared to cumulative U.S. incidence at those tumor sites (0.55 vs 0.79, OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.68-0.74, P<0.0001). F:M enrollment and U.S. incidence by the main GI tumor sites where approvals occurred is shown in Table. Female enrollment rates were also lower than U.S. female cancer mortality and prevalence rates in these tumor sites (P<0.0001 for all). Female enrollment in GI trials fell between 2008-2013 and 2014-2018 (38 vs 33%, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Although disparity in female enrollment may be improving across combined FDA cancer drug approval trials, underrepresentation of females has persisted in GI cancer trials when compared to F:M cancer incidence, prevalence and mortality in the U.S. More work is required to determine the drivers of this disparity, in order to mitigate it.

Cancer TypeFemale, n (%): Male, n (%)
Trial Enrollment
Female, n (%): Male, n (%)
2018 US Incidence
Odds Ratio for Female Enrollment (95% Confidence Interval, P value)
Colorectal2,235 (40): 3,362 (60)74,269 (48): 80,829 (52)0.72 (0.69-0.76, P<0.0001)
Gastroesophageal501 (27): 1,362 (73)9,542 (37): 16,484 (63)0.64 (0.57-0.71, P<0.0001)
Hepatocellular112 (14): 675 (86)10,666 (28): 27,282 (72)0.42 (0.35-0.52, P<0.0001)
Pancreatic591 (42): 806 (58)24,234 (48): 26,612 (52)0.81 (0.72-0.90, P<0.0001)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Esophageal and Gastric Cancer and Other GI Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38, 2020 (suppl 4; abstr 809)

Abstract #

809

Poster Bd #

J13

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Vasanthan Muthusamy Kumarasamy

Abstract

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Disparities in prostate cancer mortality and clinical trial availability across vulnerable populations.

First Author: Rishi Sekar

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

The effect of advances in management of uterine-serous-carcinoma on population mortality.

First Author: Aifen Wang

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Cancer in Southeast Asia: A comparative analysis of 2022 incidence and mortality data.

First Author: Edward Christopher Christopher Dee