Shared decision making about opioid therapy for cancer patients: Do patients and providers take the same factors into consideration?

Authors

null

Maria J. Silveira

University of Michigan, Palliative Care Program, Ann Arbor, MI

Maria J. Silveira, Karleen F Giannitrapani, Soraya Fereydooni, Azin Azarfar, Peter Glassman, William Becker, Karl Lorenz

Organizations

University of Michigan, Palliative Care Program, Ann Arbor, MI, Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System & Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto and Stanford University, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles and UCLA, Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities and Education Center, VA Connecticut & Yale, New Haven, CA

Research Funding

Other Government Agency
Veterans Affairs
Background: Many patients with cancer pain are appropriately managed on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT), but are at similar risk of overdose and addiction as are patients with non-cancer pain. Whether to commence opioids for cancer pain is often a shared decision between patient and provider. Little is known about this process.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 20 cancer patients on LTOT and 20 interdisciplinary providers who prescribe LTOT from two VA medical centers. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using constant comparison to find common themes.

Results: Providers and patients largely weighed the risks and benefits of LTOT similarly, except in the case of cancer patients with past/present substance use disorder (SUD). In those cases, providers felt the risks outweighed the benefits, while patients felt the benefits outweighed the risks. Generally, patients considered pain relief their overarching concern. Other factors that impacted their risk/benefit calculus included: personal/family experience with opioids and the opinions of trusted providers. Only rarely did patients defer decision making to providers. Factors that impacted the risk/benefit calculus of providers included: disease status, patient goals, patient characteristics, and providers' past experiences/biases. Of note, patients with past opioid exposure generally viewed their experience with opioids as positive, and usually anchored their risk assessment for opioids relative to those of chemotherapy. Patients also expressed that they would prefer to spend less physician time discussing LTOT and more time discussing cancer treatment instead.

Conclusions: Patients and providers often agree on when it is appropriate to use LTOT for cancer pain. In cases where they disagree, providers are well advised to explore and address patients’ fears about the adequacy of pain management without opioids, as well as their lived experience with opioids. Patients are comfortable having such discussions with physician extenders in order to reserve face-to-face physician time to discuss cancer treatment instead.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Advance Care Planning,End-of-Life Care,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care,Coordination and Continuity of Care,Caregiver Support,Biology of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Disparities in Supportive Care

Sub Track

Communication and Shared Decision Making

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 31; abstr 32)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.31_suppl.32

Abstract #

32

Poster Bd #

D2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Desiree Rachel Azizoddin

First Author: Sara Marie DeForge

First Author: Desiree Rachel Azizoddin

First Author: Talya Salz