Antiemetic efficacy of intravenous (IV) NEPA in patients with breast cancer (BC) receiving anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy.

Authors

Lee Schwartzberg

Lee S. Schwartzberg

West Cancer Center, Germantown, TN

Lee S. Schwartzberg, Matti S. Aapro

Organizations

West Cancer Center, Germantown, TN, Genolier Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Helsinn Healthcare.
Background:

The complexity of administering multi-agent prophylactic antiemetic combinations required to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) may contribute to poor guideline adherence seen in multiple studies. NEPA, a combination antiemetic of an NK1 receptor antagonist (RA) [netupitant (oral)/fosnetupitant (IV)] and 5-HT3RA, palonosetron, offers 5-day CINV prevention with a single dose. Unlike other IV NK1RAs, the fosnetupitant solution does not require a surfactant, emulsifier, or solubility enhancer and contains no allergenic excipients, thereby minimizing infusion-related toxicities that have been reported with other NK1RAs. This study previously reported the safety of IV NEPA in BC patients receiving repeat cycles of AC; there were no infusion-site or hypersensitivity reactions related to IV NEPA reported. The efficacy results of this study are the focus of this presentation.

 

Methods:

This was a Phase 3b, double-blind safety study in females with BC naïve to highly/moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a single 30-min infusion of IV NEPA or a single oral NEPA capsule on Day 1 prior to AC. Oral dexamethasone was also given to all patients before AC on Day 1 only. Complete response (CR: no emesis, no rescue) and no significant nausea (NSN: < 25mm on 100mm VAS scale) rates were calculated daily during the 5 days (0-120 h) post-AC in Cycle 1. No formal statistical comparison between groups was planned.

 

Results:

402 total patients were included in the analysis. Most patients were white (93%) with ECOG status of 0 (75%); the mean age was 55 years. Comparable CR and NSN rates were seen for IV and oral NEPA during each of the 5 days post-AC.

 

 

Complete Response

No Significant Nausea

% patients

IV NEPA

(N = 200)

Oral NEPA

(N = 202)

IV NEPA

(N = 200)

Oral NEPA

(N = 202)

Day 1

86.5

88.6

84.0

85.1

Day 2

84.0

85.6

85.0

85.1

Day 3

81.5

84.7

80.0

82.7

Day 4

88.0

90.1

85.5

86.1

Day 5

92.0

91.6

88.5

88.1

Days 1-5

73.0

77.2

70.0

74.8

 

Conclusions:

As a simplified single-dose formulation, IV NEPA showed high response rates in BC patients receiving AC, with favorable safety as no treatment-related infusion-site/hypersensitivity reactions were reported.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Mental Health and Psychological Well-being,Psychosocial and Spiritual/Cultural Assessment and Management,Models of Care,Patient Reported Outcomes and Patient Experience,Prevention, Assessment, and Management of Disease and Treatment-related Symptoms,Prognostication ,Survivorship and Late Effects of Cancer

Sub Track

Prevention, Assessment, and Management of Disease and Treatment-related Symptoms

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03403712

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 31; abstr 115)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.31_suppl.115

Abstract #

115

Poster Bd #

D4

Abstract Disclosures