Background: The standard of care for treatment of advanced cervical cancer is the combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and intracavitary brachytherapy with cisplatin based concurrent chemotherapy. Radiotherapy plays a crucial role in treatment of cervical cancer. Recent GEC-ESTRO guidelines recommend that the dose to 90% (D90) of the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) in cervical cancer be at least 85Gy with higher doses for poor response to radiotherapy. This study was aim to analyze our institution’s patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in regards to whether higher brachytherapy dose delivery lead to a better outcome, and to investigate the proper dose to balance the local control rate and toxicity. Methods: A total of 262 patients with local advanced cervical cancer treated at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed for the association between dosimetry and outcomes. Youden index was used to identify the optimal cut-off point of continuous tumor parameters and divide patients into subgroups. Significance of radiotherapy dose parameters on OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS and toxicity was evaluated. Results: In the univariate analysis, for both HR-CTV and LR-CTV, the high dose group (EQD2 D90 >75Gy, LR-CTV>68Gy, respectively) have a better LRFS than low-dose groups (P<0.05). LR-CTV remains significance after adjusted for age and FIGO stage. Moreover, in the high-dose LR-CTV group, there is no association between dose of LR-CTV and LRFS was found, however, higher dose of HR-CTV significant associated with higher ratio of side effect was found. In addition, no association of dose of HR-CTV or LR-CTV and OS were found for all patients. Conclusions: Our results showed that dose of LR-CTV may be a useful prognostic factor of LRFS of patients with cervical cancer. Moreover, after D90 of LR-CTV reaches 68Gy, increasing dose did not show a better LRFS but lead to higher ratio of toxicity, supporting that LR-CTV at 68Gy might be a safety and efficacy dose of radiotherapy to the patients with cervical cancer. However, further improved in dose had no significant benefit on local control rate, and it might increase the risks of toxicity.