Identification of sentinel lymph nodes using contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors

null

Xiufeng Wu

Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China

Xiufeng Wu , Lina Tang , Yi Zeng , Xia Chen

Organizations

Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China, Fuajian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for the identification of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in breast cancer patients with cN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: Patients with cN0 following NAC (n=66) received a periareolar injection of SonoVue followed by ultrasound (US) to identify contrast-enhanced SLN before surgery. All patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection for verification of axillary node status after the SLN biopsy. The identification rate, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false negative rate, negative predictive value, positive predictive value was recorded. Results: In almost all cases, the SLNs were easily identified with an identification rate of 98.5 % (65/66). Compared with pathological diagnosis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and false negative rate of CEUS for SLN diagnosis were 66.7%, 95.8%, 78.8%, and 14.3% respectively. Conclusions: Identification of SLN by CEUS is a technically feasible method with an identification rate as high as 98.5%.

Patient and tumor characteristics.

CharacteristicsNumber of patients (N=66) (%)
Age
    <5043(65.2%)
    >5023(34.8%)
Tumor size
    <2cm18(27.3%)
    >2cm45(68.2%)
    Tx3 (4.5%)
Grade
    I10(15.2%)
    II22(33.3%)
    III34(51.5%)
Tumor histology
    IDC50(75.8%)
    ILC16(24.2%)
Estrogen receptor status
    Positive16(24.2%)
    Negative50(75.8%)
HER2 status
    Positive42(63.6%)
    Negative24(36.4%)

Comparison of SLN involvement rates between using CEUS and pathology in breast cancer patients with cN0 following NAC.

SLN status using CEUS
ALND
Total
PositiveNegative
Positive12214PPV=85.7% (12/14)
Negative64652NPV=88.5% (45/52)
Total184866FNR=14.3% (2/14)
Sens=66.7% (12/18)Spec=95.8% (46/48)Accuracy=78.8%(52/66)

Sens: Sensitivity; Spec: Specificity; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value. FNR: False negative rate.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Breakthrough

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Access to Care, Diagnostics, Early Detection and Diagnosis, Prevention and Screening, and Surveillance

Track

Access to Care,Diagnostics,Early Detection and Diagnosis,Prevention and Screening,Surveillance

Sub Track

Early Detection and Diagnosis

Citation

J Glob Oncol 5, 2019 (suppl 1; abstr 59)

DOI

10.1200/JGO.2019.5.suppl.59

Abstract #

59

Poster Bd #

D13

Abstract Disclosures