Impact of the Oncology Care Model (OCM) on pain management: A retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors

null

Aaron Ciner

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ

Aaron Ciner, Jacqueline Norrell, Renee Kurz, Ann W. Silk

Organizations

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Pain is a common symptom among patients with cancer and impacts performance status and quality of life. The OCM was implemented at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (RCINJ) in July 2016 with the goal of improving many quality metrics in cancer care including documentation of pain and a plan of care for pain. Hypothesis: Documentation of pain and a plan of care for pain improved after implementation of the OCM at RCINJ. Improved documentation would correlate with a decrease in reported quantitative pain scores.

Methods: Data from patients enrolled in OCM during its first year of implementation (post OCM) was compared to data from a control cohort the preceding year (pre OCM). The initial progress note and EMR flowsheet in each year were reviewed to determine pain documentation. For patients reporting a pain score ≥ 1 on a 0-10 scale, the association between documentation of a plan of care and improvement in quantitative pain score on a subsequent visit was analyzed using Chi square testing.

Results: A total of 260 patient charts were analyzed. A quantitative pain score was documented in 99% of patients in the pre OCM group and 100% in the post OCM group. For those with a pain score ≥ 1, documentation of a plan of care increased from 43% to 55% after OCM implementation. Patients whose charts contained documented plans of care for pain were less likely to have decreased pain scores at a subsequent visit (51% vs 76%).

Impact of OCM on pain documentation

Documented pain score

Pre OCM: 134/135 (99%)

Post OCM:

125/125 (100%)

p= NS

Documented plan of care

Pre OCM:

17/40 (43%)

Post OCM:

22/40 (55%)

p= 0.371

Impact of documentation on subsequent visit

Decreased pain score on subsequent encounter

Yes Plan of Care:

20/39 (51%)

No Plan of Care:

31/41 (76%)

p= 0.042

Conclusions: (1) Documentation of a quantitative pain score was completed in nearly all patients before and after the implementation of OCM. (2) There was a non-statistically significant increase in documentation of plan of care for pain after OCM implementation. (3) Documentation of a plan of care was not associated with a decreased pain score at a subsequent visit. This may be the result of small sample size or related to progressive cancer-related pain or inadequate pain intervention.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Advance Care Planning,End-of-Life Care,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care,Coordination and Continuity of Care,Caregiver Support,Biology of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Disparities in Supportive Care

Sub Track

Models of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 31; abstr 86)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.31_suppl.86

Abstract #

86

Poster Bd #

C3

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

The impact of end-of-life quality metrics on date of death and hospice documentation over time.

First Author: Divya Deepak

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Do OCM-related increases in screening for depression and pain improve patient-reported symptoms?

First Author: Sean McClellan

First Author: Adil Jamal Akhtar

First Author: Joud El Dick