Mixed methods comparison of functional decline during chemotherapy, immunotherapy (IO), and/or targeted therapy in older adults with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors

Melisa Wong

Melisa L. Wong

University of California, San Francisco, CA

Melisa L. Wong, Alexander K. Smith, Christine Miaskowski, Vivek Musinipally, Harvey Jay Cohen, Vivian Lam, Melissa Mazor, Carling Jade Ursem, Kah Poh Loh, Jamie Cohen, Dianne Shumay, Anna Ordin Levin, Niharika Dixit, Janice Grandi, Louise Christie Walter

Organizations

University of California, San Francisco, CA, University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA, Duke University Center for the Study of Aging, Durham, NC, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco and Zuckerberg San Francisco General, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Background: Functional decline during NSCLC treatment is critically important to older adults. Yet, data on functional decline—particularly during chemoIO, IO, and targeted therapy—remain limited. Additionally, the best measures to capture functional decline from the patient’s perspective remain unknown.

Methods: We conducted a multisite, mixed methods prospective cohort study to characterize function during systemic NSCLC treatment and compare quantitative measures with gold standard qualitative descriptions of patients’ lived experience. Prior to and at 2 months after treatment initiation, 69 adults age >65 with advanced NSCLC starting chemo, IO, and/or targeted therapy underwent geriatric assessments including instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (PF), and Life-Space Assessment (LSA). LSA measures where a person goes in their environment, how frequently, and how independently. Pretreatment functional impairment and decline at 2 months were assessed. In a qualitative substudy, 16 purposively sampled patients with diverse pretreatment function completed two semi-structured interviews (pretreatment, 2 months) to explore treatment effects on daily functioning. Grounded theory was used to code for functional decline. Using the qualitative patient experience as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each functional measure.

Results: Mean age was 75 (range 65-94). NSCLC treatment included IO (36%), targeted therapy (28%), chemoIO (23%), and chemo (13%). Pretreatment functional impairment was common and ~25% of patients experienced functional decline on quantitative measures at 2 months (Table). Qualitatively, 50% described functional decline at 2 months. LSA had the highest sensitivity (71%) and similar specificity (88%) as IADL and PF.

Pretreatment impairment (%, N = 69) Functional Decline at 2 Months (%, N = 69) Sensitivity (%, n = 16) Specificity (%, n = 16)
IADL 67 23 50 88
PF 67 20 43 88
LSA 41 24 71 88
Conclusions: Functional decline during NSCLC treatment is common. LSA provides a sensitive and specific patient-centered measure of function.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Rapid Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Rapid Abstract Session

Track

Biology of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Patient Reported Outcomes and Patient Experience,Prevention, Assessment, and Management of Disease and Treatment-related Symptoms

Sub Track

Patient Reported Outcomes and Patient Experience

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 31; abstr 92)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.31_suppl.92

Abstract #

92

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Anika Kumar

First Author: Cristiane Decat Bergerot

First Author: Dani E Gholam