Patterns of palliative care among patients receiving palliative radiotherapy.

Authors

null

Jie Jane Chen

Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Jie Jane Chen, Bhupendra Rawal, Monica Shalini Krishnan, Lauren Michelle Hertan, Diana D. Shi, Claudia Sofia Roldan, Mai Anh Huynh, Alexander Spektor, Tracy A. Balboni

Organizations

Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, ME, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding received
None
Background:

Few studies have examined how palliative care (PC) delivered by a dedicated PC team is integrated at the time of radiotherapy (RT) consultation. We aimed to characterize patterns of PC in relation to RT, predictors of PC, and outcomes based on PC integration.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 162 patients with metastatic cancer who received palliative RT at a single institution (7/2017-2/2018). PC integration was defined as: no PC, concurrent PC (PC initiated +/- 4 weeks within RT consult), established PC (any PC visit in the 6 months prior to RT consult), and subsequent PC (PC initiated > 4 weeks after RT consult). Logistic regression analyses determined predictors of receiving any PC. Cox proportional hazards regression identified predictors of OS.

Results:

Median follow-up was 7.8 months (range: 0.3-20.6). Patients (56% female; 84% white; median age: 64 years (range: 22-94)) had a median of 2 metastatic sites (range: 1-6) and 2 prior courses of palliative chemotherapy (range: 0-7). Of the 74 patients (46%) with any PC, 24 (32%) had concurrent PC, 21 (28%) had established PC, and 29 (39%) had subsequent PC. The most common reasons for PC initiation were pain (58%) and goals of care/end-of-life care management (20%). Nearly half (49%) of PC consults occurred in an inpatient setting; a minority (22%) of RT consults were inpatient. On multivariate analysis, receiving any PC significantly differed by race (non-white vs white, OR = 6.40 [95% CI 1.98-20.69], p = 0.002), cancer type (lung vs non-breast other histology, OR = 0.15 [95% CI 0.06-0.35], p < 0.001), and RT consult setting (inpatient vs outpatient, OR = 3.32 [95% CI 1.36-8.13], p = 0.009). On multivariate analysis, male sex (HR = 1.51 [95% CI 1.01-2.27], p = 0.046) and ECOG 2-4 (HR = 2.22 [95% CI 1.47-3.36], p < 0.001) predicted worse OS. Age, marital status, language, insurance type, metastatic burden, prior palliative chemotherapy, and PC integration were not independent predictors of OS.

Conclusions:

At our institution, dedicated PC occurred in < 50% of patients receiving palliative RT for metastatic cancer. We need initiatives to increase PC for all palliative RT patients, especially in the outpatient setting and for those with lung cancer who were less likely to receive dedicated PC.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Advance Care Planning,End-of-Life Care,Communication and Shared Decision Making,Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care,Coordination and Continuity of Care,Caregiver Support,Biology of Symptoms and Treatment Toxicities,Disparities in Supportive Care

Sub Track

Integration and Delivery of Palliative and Supportive Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 31; abstr 55)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.31_suppl.55

Abstract #

55

Poster Bd #

E10

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Racial disparities in utilization of palliative care among inpatients admitted for lung cancer.

First Author: Kavya Bharathidasan

First Author: Therese Marie Mulvey