Bias and stereotyping among research and clinical professionals: Perspectives on minority recruitment for oncology clinical trials.

Authors

null

Soumya J. Niranjan

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Soumya J. Niranjan, Michelle Y. Martin, Mona N Fouad, Selwyn M. Vickers, Jennifer Wenzel, Elise D. Cook, Badrinath R. Konety, Raegan W Durant

Organizations

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Background: Extensive attention has been paid in recent years to the possibility that bias among health care professionals contributes to health disparities. In its 2003 report, Unequal Treatment, the Institute of Medicine concluded that bias against racial minorities may affect communication or care offered. However, the role of bias in the context of recruitment of racial minorities in cancer clinical trials has not been explored. Therefore, we assessed clinical and research personnel’s experiences related to factors influencing recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities for cancer clinical trials. Methods: Ninety-one qualitative interviews were conducted at 5 U.S. cancer centers among 4 stakeholder groups: cancer center leaders, principal investigators, referring clinicians and research staff. Data analysis was conducted using a content analysis approach to generate themes from the transcribed interviews. Results: Five prominent themes emerged. 1) Recruitment interactions with potential minority participants were perceived to be challenging. 2) Potential minority participants were not perceived to be ideal study candidates. 3) A combination of clinic level barriers and negative perceptions of minority study participants led to providers withholding clinical trial opportunities from potential minority participants. 4) When clinical trial recruitment practices were tailored to minority patients, addressing research misconceptions to build trust was a common strategy. 5) For some respondents, race was perceived as irrelevant when screening and recruiting potential minority participants for clinical trials. Conclusions: Not only did some respondents view racial and ethnic minorities as less promising participants, some respondents reported withholding trial opportunities to minorities based on these perceptions. Some providers endorsed using tailored recruitment strategies while others eschewed race as a factor in trial recruitment. The presence of bias and stereotyping among clinical and research professionals recruiting for cancer clinical trials, should be considered when designing interventions to increase minority enrollment.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy; Health Equity and Disparities

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities

Sub Track

Health Disparities

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 152)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.152

Abstract #

152

Poster Bd #

P3

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jenny Jing Xiang

First Author: Jenny Jing Xiang

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Racial and ethnic representation in large B-cell lymphoma trials and real-world databases.

First Author: Javier Munoz