Characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival from three cohorts of advanced or metastatic cancer patients using health care claims data in the United States.

Authors

null

Daniel C Beachler

Safety and Epidemiology, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE

Daniel C Beachler, Francois-Xavier Lamy, Leo J Russo, Stephan Lanes, Jade Dinh, Devon H Taylor, Ruihua Yin, Aziza Jamal-Allial, Patrice Verpillat

Organizations

Safety and Epidemiology, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, Global Epidemiology, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, Safety and Epidemiology, HealthCore, Inc., Andover, MA, Safety and Epidemiology, HealthCore, Inc., Alexandria, VA, Safety and Epidemiology, HealthCore, Inc., Watertown, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
This study was co-sponsored by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.

Background: Our main objective was to identify, in healthcare claims data, patients with advanced or metastatic: urothelial carcinoma (amUC), gastric cancer (amGC) and non-small cell lung cancer (amNSCLC) and to report on their characteristics, treatments, and survival rates using contemporaneous real-world data. Methods: This cohort study was conducted in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD), from January 2010 to January 2018, which contains healthcare claims data from commercial health plans across the US (60 million lives). We applied algorithms, previously validated on registry data, to the HIRD to define 3 cohorts of advanced stage cancer. Cohort characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Patient vital status was captured through probabilistic linkage with the National Death Index (NDI) and survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Algorithms to predict advanced stage cancer resulted in the following cohorts: 1,501 amUC, 6,253 amGC and 38,451 amNSCLC cases. Most patients in each cohort were de novo advanced or metastatic, but subsets were diagnosed at early stage and progressed to advanced stage (ranging from 15.1% for amNSCLC to 23.1% for amUC). Patient characteristics, treatments and survival outcomes are described in Table 1. Not all received systemic treatment; Immune Checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were used in 5.3%, 2.2% and 10.8% of treated amUC, amGC and amNSCLC patients, respectively. Conclusions: In these cohorts of advanced or metastatic cancer patients, median survival time was limited despite most receiving treatment: radiation, systemic therapy or surgery. Treatment with ICI was low despite recent data in amUC and amNSCLC.

Characteristics, treatments, and survival from estimated advanced stage date.

amUC
N=1501
amGC
N=6253
amNSCLC
N=38451
Progressed from early stage (%)23.117.615.1
Mean age (years)64.862.163.5
Female (%)36.932.744.9
Surgery (%)30.56.67.8
Radiotherapy (%)16.215.726.7
Systemic therapy (%)59.162.659.2
Mean N of lines during follow-up1.81.91.8
NDI linkage (%)75.160.762.3
Median OS (years)1.80.91.1
3-year survival rate (%)36.728.231.2

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy; Health Equity and Disparities

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities

Sub Track

Access to Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 129)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.129

Abstract #

129

Poster Bd #

K4

Abstract Disclosures