Adherence to breast cancer treatment guidelines according to pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes in a population-based cohort.

Authors

Steven Katz

Steven J. Katz

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Steven J. Katz, Monica Morrow, Allison W. Kurian

Organizations

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Background: Increasing use of germline genetic testing may have unintended consequences on breast cancer treatment. We do not know whether treatment deviates from guidelines for women with pathogenic variants (PV) in cancer susceptibility genes. Methods: SEER data for all women aged ≥20 years, diagnosed with breast cancer in 2014-15 and reported to Georgia and California registries (N=77,588) by December 1, 2016 were linked to germline genetic testing results from 4 laboratories that did nearly all clinical testing. We examined first course of therapy of stage <IV patients who linked to a genetic test: bilateral mastectomy (BLM) in candidates for surgery (unilateral, stages 0-III); post-lumpectomy radiation in those with an indication (all but age ≥70, stage I, hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative); and chemotherapy in those without definitive indication (stage I-II, HR-positive, HER2-negative and 21-gene recurrence score <30). We report the percent treated based on multivariable modeling, adjusted for age, race, stage, grade, insurance and socioeconomic status. Results: The table shows that 9% of patients who linked to a genetic test result had a PV (N=1,283). Compared to women with negative results, those with BRCA1/2 PVs were more likely to receive BLM, more likely to receive chemotherapy without definitive indication, and less likely to receive indicated radiation as initial treatment. Lower-magnitude effects were seen with other PVs but not variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Conclusions: In a population-based setting, women with PVs in BRCA1/2 or other cancer susceptibility genes may have higher risk of receiving locoregional and systemic treatment that does not follow guidelines.

Test Results (mutually exclusive) Treatment Use
BLM
N=10,144
% (95% CI)
Radiation
N=4,575
% (95% CI)
Chemotherapy
N=5,504
% (95% CI)
Negative N=10,418 23.0 (22.0-24.0) 74.5 (73.1–75.9) 19.2 (18.1-20.3)
VUS N=2,539 24.6 (22.5-26.7) 74.2 (71.2–77.2) 18.4 (16.1-20.9)
BRCA1/2 PV N=850 55.4 (51.0-59.9) 48.0 (38.1–57.8) 31.6 (26.7-36.6)
Other PV* N=433 34.5 (28.9-40.1) 68.1 (59.8–76.3) 23.6 (17.8-29.4)

*ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, NBN, TP53, BARD1 and others

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy; Health Equity and Disparities

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities

Sub Track

Guideline-Concordant Care Initiatives

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 34)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.34

Abstract #

34

Poster Bd #

C13

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Nicole Casasanta

First Author: Erin Aiello Bowles

First Author: Marija Stojovska