A nutrition-focused quality improvement program to improve rate of documented nutrition plan at a safety-net hospital gastrointestinal (GI) oncology clinic.

Authors

null

Nicholas Levonyak

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Nicholas Levonyak, Mary P Hodges, Nicole Broome, Muhammad Shaalan Beg, Radhika Kainthla, Aravind Sanjeevaiah, Navid Sadeghi, Neha Pandey, Verca Mhoon, John Vernon Cox, Syed Mohammad Ali Kazmi

Organizations

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Patients with GI cancer have amongst the highest rates of malnutrition, which contributes to decreased quality of life, increased morbidity and mortality, as well as higher healthcare costs. In the GI Oncology clinic at Parkland Health and Hospital System (PHHS), the number of patients with a documented nutritional plan by a registered dietitian was 7%, and there was no standardized screening method for malnutrition in place. Methods: The aim was to increase the rate of documented nutritional assessment by a registered dietitian to 25%. Multidisciplinary sessions involving physicians, registered dietitians, registered nurses, and hospital administration were arranged to identify barriers to nutritional interventions for GI Oncology clinic patients. Results: Prior to QI interventions, between October-December 2018, the total number of GI cancer patients referred to registered dietitian clinic was 11- 30 referrals, which accounted for 7-10.1% of GI cancer patient in the respective month. As part of first PDSA cycle, a registered-dietitian was assigned to GI oncology clinic. The total number of documented nutrition plan after first intervention was 22 GI cancer patient (15% of GI cancer patients). We then developed an adapted-version of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and implemented it through the institute electronic medical record. The nursing staff and physicians were educated about administering the screening tool and the referral process to a registered-dietitian after a positive MST screen. After the first month during which MST was implemented, the rate of nutritional assessment increased to total of 20.5% of GI cancer patients (total 37 referrals). Twenty out of the 37 referrals (54%) were due to the positive MST screening tool. Conclusions: Through a nutrition focused QI program, we doubled the rate of a documented nutritional plan for PHHS GI cancer patients in a month of starting the 2nd PDSA cycle intervention. Through future PDSA cycles, we plan to further increase patient access to nutritional assessments and then broaden our efforts to the entire PHHS oncology clinic.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Patient Experience; Safety; Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care

Track

Patient Experience,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Safety

Sub Track

Tools for Management of Treatment and Adverse Effects

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 289)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.289

Abstract #

289

Poster Bd #

J2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Ali Rashed Kazmi

First Author: Nicholas Levonyak