A standardized workflow to improve the consent process among patients initiating an oral anticancer drug.

Authors

null

Jessica S. Brown

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY

Jessica S. Brown, Dawn L. Hershman, Daniel O'Neil, Lois Brafman, Deborah A. Fuentes, Laura Graafland, Cynthia Law, Meghna S. Trivedi, Kevin Kalinsky, Katherine D. Crew, Melissa Kate Accordino

Organizations

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, Columbia University-Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: The American Society of Clinical Oncology and The Oncology Nursing Society’s guidelines recommend that consent be obtained and patient education provided prior to oral anticancer drug (OACD) initiation. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve documentation rates of consent and education prior to OACD initiation in an outpatient breast oncology clinic. Methods: Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology was used to identify the root causes of inadequate OACD documentation; and to evaluate a standardized OACD workflow that included a multidisciplinary (physician, nurse practitioner [NP], and administrative staff) checklist on the disposition sheet and standardized patient education material, used in the Columbia University Irving Medical Center Breast Oncology Clinic. New OACD prescriptions were identified in the electronic health record (EHR) from 2/1/18-4/1/18 (pre-intervention) and 6/5/18-8/17/18 (post-intervention). Documentation of consent and education were evaluated by EHR review. Consent (yes/no) was determined by physician documentation in either the corresponding clinic note or scanned consent form, and education (yes/no) was determined by NP documentation in the education section of the clinic note. Documentation rates were compared pre- and post-intervention. Results: Pre-intervention, 19 patients received a new OACD, and 0 (0%) had documentation of consent or patient education. Root cause analysis revealed the driver of inadequate documentation was the inability to identify patients with a new OACD prescription at the time of their clinic visit. After implementation of the OACD workflow, 23 patients initiated a new OACD, 15 (65.0%) had documentation of consent and 7 (30.0%) had OACD education documented in the EHR. Conclusions: After the first PDSA cycle, documentation of consent and education improved from baseline. However, improvement in both metrics are still needed. Patient volume, staff changes, and the format of the OACD checklist may have limited the efficacy of this intervention. In the next PDSA cycle, the consent process will be linked to the required OACD pre-approval process to further increase OACD documentation.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Patient Experience; Safety; Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care

Track

Patient Experience,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Safety

Sub Track

Standardization Efforts to Improve Safety

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 259)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.259

Abstract #

259

Poster Bd #

G10

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Impact of medically integrated pharmacies on oral anticancer medication prescription abandonment.

First Author: Gury K. Doshi

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Improving performance status documentation using an electronic medical record tool.

First Author: Megan Emmich

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

The impact of end-of-life quality metrics on date of death and hospice documentation over time.

First Author: Divya Deepak