Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy in the United States.

Authors

null

Yizhen Lai

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ

Yizhen Lai, Yichen Zhong, Haojie Li, Karl Patterson, Oliver Hale, Yang Meng, Tara L. Frenkl, James Luke Godwin, Ronac Mamtani

Organizations

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, BresMed Health Solutions, Sheffield, United Kingdom, BresMed Health Solutions, Las Vegas, NV, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck & Co., Inc.

Background: Pembrolizumab is indicated as first-line therapy for cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) whose tumors express PD-L1 with a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10. This study aims to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine in this setting from the US payer perspective. Methods: A partitioned-survival model was developed to measure the costs and effectiveness over a 20-year time horizon with an annual discount of 3%. Clinical outcomes of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival, safety outcomes and time on treatment were modeled using data from the KEYNOTE-052 clinical trial for pembrolizumab and four clinical trials for carboplatin plus gemcitabine. Because clinical trials directly comparing these treatment strategies are not available, a simulation treatment comparison and a network meta-analysis were conducted to estimate comparative efficacy. Quality of life data extracted from EQ-5D questionnaires administered in KEYNOTE-052 were used to estimate utility, while cost data were estimated using US pricing lists and real-world data. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Pembrolizumab was also compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in the scenario analyses. Results: Pembrolizumab was associated with a survival gain of 2.47 years and 1.90 quality adjusted life years (QALY), an incremental cost of $155,238, and an incremental cost per QALY gained of $81,493 versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine. Results were most sensitive to the time horizon, discount rate, pembrolizumab dosing intensity and OS hazard ratio. Pembrolizumab had 87% or 100% probability of being cost-effective vs. chemotherapy at a $100,000 or $150,000 willingness-to-pay threshold, respectively. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab appears cost-effective versus carboplatin plus gemcitabine as first-line treatment of cisplatin-ineligible and PD-L1 positive mUC patients in the US. The comparison of pembrolizumab with gemcitabine monotherapy yields similar conclusions.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy; Health Equity and Disparities

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 93)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.93

Abstract #

93

Poster Bd #

G8

Abstract Disclosures