Meeting lung cancer value based care requirements with documentation of patient goals and preferences.

Authors

null

Avnish K Bhatia

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA

Avnish K Bhatia, Devika Govind Das, Debra Wujcik, Susie Owenby, Wanda D. Hall, Tasha Smith, Ralph Zinner

Organizations

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, Carevive, Inc., Nashville, TN, Carevive Systems, Inc, Miami, FL, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Genentech.

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 25% of all cancer deaths with 5-year survival of 6%. Recent scientific advances in molecular based treatments and immunotherapy and insurers’ emphasis on patient-centered care is changing patient care. This study sought to incorporate patients’ perceptions, goals, and preferences into treatment planning. Methods: After provider education and using electronic care planning software (CPS), a pilot of 50 patients with advanced NSCLC from two academic centers completed tablet-based surveys addressing treatment goals, decision-making preferences, and interest in clinical trials. Results were shared with the provider during the visit. Once treatment was selected, the CPS generated a personalized care management plan. Results: Participants were mean age 65 (range 41-86), 52% female, and 78% white. 60% (12/20) Stage IV patients believed that their cancer was curable. 62% (31/50) were not interested in clinical trial participation. 48% (24/50) wanted to share treatment decision making; 34% (12/50) wanted to make the final decision after seriously considering the doctor’s opinion; 6% (3/ 50) wanted the provider to make the final decision but consider their opinion, and 10% (5/50) wanted to leave all decisions to the provider. Conclusions: Patient perception of curability and decision-making preferences were important domains identified by personalized-care management planning in this Lung Cancer pilot study. Pre-visit CPS use provided the opportunity for the provider to address treatment intent and decision-making at the point-of-care. Academic centers generally expect their patients to have strong interest in clinical trials; Investigation for the reasons for disinterest warrants further exploration.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Patient Experience; Safety; Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care

Track

Patient Experience,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Safety

Sub Track

Shared Decision Making and Patient Engagement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 222)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.222

Abstract #

222

Poster Bd #

E5

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts