Enhancing community capacity to deliver value-based cancer care at the end-of-life.

Authors

null

Manali I. Patel

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Manali I. Patel, David Ramirez, Richy Agajanian, Hilda H. Agajanian, Tumaini Coker

Organizations

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, CareMore, Cerritos, CA, The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Downey, CA, The Oncology Institute, Los Angeles, CA, Seattle Children's, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Background: To improve value-based cancer care, we designed an intervention using lay health workers (LHWs) who we trained to assess patient's symptoms. LHWs referred patients to palliative care and/or behavioral health in response to positive assessments. We implemented the intervention in collaboration with a community oncology group and a Medicare Advantage payer for patients with all stages of cancer. At ASCO 2019 we demonstrated the associated reductions in patient-reported symptoms, acute care use, and total costs of care. This study evaluates the effect of the intervention on end-of-life cancer care, specifically healthcare use in the last month of life and total costs of care from diagnosis until death. Methods: We enrolled all newly diagnosed health plan beneficiaries with solid and hematologic malignancies from 11/2016 through 9/2018 and compared outcomes to all patients diagnosed with cancer in the year prior to the intervention (control arm). For all patients who died within 12-months follow-up, we compared risk of death using Cox Models and generalized linear regression to compare healthcare use in the last month of life, and total costs of care from diagnosis until death. All models were adjusted for age, stage, comorbidities, diagnosis, and length of follow-up. Results: 180 patients in the intervention and 156 in the control died during the study. In both groups, the mean age was 80 years; 49% were non-Hispanic White, 40% Hispanic, 5% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 4% black. There were no differences in survival (HR 0.96, p = 0.6). Intervention patients as compared to the control had lower mean inpatient admissions (0.3 +/- 0.04 versus 0.5 +/- 0.07, p = 0.02) and emergency department visits per thousand members per year (0.11 +/- 0.02 versus 0.49 +/- 0.06, p < 0.001) in the last month of life, greater proportion of patients with hospice use (69% versus 48%, p < 0.001), lower proportion of patients with acute care facility deaths (37.5% versus 62.5%, p = 0.02) and lower median total healthcare costs from diagnosis until death ($24,902 versus $33,145, p = 0.02). Conclusions: An LHW intervention significantly improved the value of end-of-life cancer care and may be a solution to improve burdensome and costly care for patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Oral Abstract Session B

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Patient Experience,Safety

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 27; abstr 4)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.4

Abstract #

4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Gunjan Sharma

First Author: Amy An