National cancer expenditure analysis in the United States Medicare population, 2013.

Authors

null

Emily S Ruiz

Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Emily S Ruiz , Kira Seiger , Arash Mostaghimi , Chrysalyne Schmults

Organizations

Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Cancer is the second leading killer in the United States, but there is no comprehensive analysis evaluating total cancer costs by cancer and treatment modality. Methods: Data from the 2013 inpatient (100%), outpatient (100%), and carrier (5%) Medicare Limited Data Set Standard Analytic Files were queried for claims filed for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for all cancer diagnoses. Claims associated with the ICD-9 codes for professional fees were analyzed by Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) code to determine resource allocation by disease. Outpatient oral chemotherapy costs were obtained from the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost database for 50 drugs used for cancer treatment in 2013. Results: $27.9 billion was spent on cancer treatment of which $12 billion (43%), $6.5 billion (23%), and $1.1 billion (4%) was allocated to professional, inpatient facility, and outpatient facility fees, respectively. Oral and hospital-based chemotherapy accounted for 17% ($4.7 billion) and 15% ($4.3 billion) of all cancer costs, respectively. Lung/thoracic cancer ($2.9 billion) had the highest total annual cost and multiple myeloma ($9,019, SD $19,962) is the most expensive cancers to treat annually per patient. Average out-of-pocket expenses are $470 (SD 287), which is 12% of the annualized per patient costs. Conclusions: In 2013, cancer accounted for only 5% of Medicare spending. Chemotherapy costs accounted for approximately a third of total spending and are likely to rise as innovation continues. Out-of-pocket spending can place a financial burden on cancer patients requiring more expensive treatments.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research, Clinical Informatics, and Quality of Care

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 6647)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.6647

Abstract #

6647

Poster Bd #

444

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Luluh Bin Dayil

First Author: Analia Nguyen

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Safe and reliable inpatient chemotherapy administration: Impact of an ambulatory oncology pharmacist.

First Author: Mary Yousef

First Author: Max Joseph Bouvette