Cell cycle progression score and PTEN as prognostic factors for metastasis in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors

Bruce Trock

Bruce J. Trock

James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Bruce J. Trock , Saradha Rajamani , Igor Vidal , Stephanie Glavaris , Tracy Jones , Misop Han , Alan W. Partin , Todd Cohen , Steven Stone , Angelo M De Marzo

Organizations

James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: To evaluate the cell cycle progression (CCP) score and PTEN as prognostic markers for risk of metastasis in a radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort of NCCN intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. Methods: This IRB-approved case-cohort study included men treated with RP at Johns Hopkins from 2007-2015. Paraffin-embedded RP tissue was analyzed blind to study outcome at Myriad Genetics, for CCP score using qRT-PCR, and PTEN by immunohistochemistry. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) was analyzed with the Cox proportional hazards model, weighted for case-cohort design. CCP and PTEN were analyzed independently, and adjusted for CAPRA-S. The CCR score, which combines CCP and CAPRA-S, was also analyzed. Data were analyzed independently by Johns Hopkins and Myriad Genetics. Results: There were 209 patients, of whom 42 were cases (metastasis). Median age was 59 years, 47% had Gleason 4+3 or higher, 48% had non-organ confined tumor, and 18% had seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement. NCCN risk was intermediate in 77% and high in 23%. Median follow-up was 4 years. Both CCP and PTEN, as well as CCR score, were statistically significant in univariate analyses, but only CCP retained statistical significance in a multivariable model of CCP, PTEN, and CAPRA-S (Table). Conclusions: This is the first comparison of the CCP score and PTEN as risk factors for metastasis in a recent RP cohort of patients at NCCN intermediate or high risk. Both CCP score and PTEN were strongly associated with MFS in univariate analyses, but only CCP score retained significance in a multivariable analysis with both biomarkers adjusted for CAPRA-S.

Univariate and multivariable models of MFS.

VariablesUnivariate
Multivariable
HR (95% CI)p-valueHR (95% CI)p-value
CCP (per unit)4.7 (2.6, 8.7)<0.000013.1 (1.6, 6.1)0.001
CAPRA-S (per unit)2.4 (1.9, 3.0)<0.000012.2 (1.7, 2.9)<0.00001
PTEN (loss vs. intact)4.3 (1.8, 10.2)0.000881.9 (0.6, 5.7)0.28
CCR (per unit)7.94 (4.6, 14.5)<0.00001NA*

* CCR score not included because it already incorporates CAPRA-S

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Genitourinary (Prostate) Cancer: Publication Only

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Epidemiology/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr e16575)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e16575

Abstract #

e16575

Abstract Disclosures